from what tracy told me not just ams.But Pages? Pages is an interesting beast because comparing it to XF you need to start factoring in the cost of something like AMS on top, and it starts to be a little less uncompetitive.
It's truly amazing what you can do with it. I'm just scratching the surface with it. I created a directory with it. See it in action here. The resources section of the same site was built with pages. I have seen bug trackers, recipe databases and more.But Pages? Pages is an interesting beast because comparing it to XF you need to start factoring in the cost of something like AMS on top, and it starts to be a little less uncompetitive.
Or other things you may not need for a discussion forum. BTW xenForo has pages last time I looked.and you still don't have clubs, calendar or pages.
XF’s page nodes are far from comparable functionality wise to Pages in Invision. Their setup lets you define content types with fields, and display and manage that. The example they give on their website in the guides section is a recipes collection. And then there’s a drag and drop page builder…IPN is not compulsory. So what’s immoral about not being forced to pay for something?
Or other things you may not need for a discussion forum. BTW xenForo has pages last time I looked.
if you want just a forum that is fine.Or other things you may not need for a discussion forum. BTW xenForo has pages last time I looked.
Why would I as I don't use the IPB any more?and it is obvious you have not played with invision pages.
I was just responding factually to the post saying xenForo did not have pages, nothing to do with being comparable.XF’s page nodes are far from comparable functionality wise to Pages in Invision.
The problem is that getting someone to “just a forum” is harder than ever - the current wisdom is that you need some other content to attract people, whether that’s articles, reviews, whatever.Why are we so unfriendly to each other...
It always depends on what you want to offer the customer.
For a forum in the classic form, XF is the best solution.
If you don't want to deal with a server and its administration, an XF cloud is the best solution.
But if you want to overburden your customers with everything possible, you're going for the overpriced product, in my humble opinion.
The discussion here is comparing apples and oranges and can't really lead to success. Likewise, far too many "forums" today are a mixture of many things that the customer doesn't want and that distracts them from the actual purpose of the discussions.
Current wisdom is correct... UNLESS it's already an established active forum.the current wisdom is that you need some other content to attract people, whether that’s articles, reviews, whatever.
Yes. Depends highly on niche of course.Seems to me like the additional content is also potentially important to keep new faces coming in, rather than relying on existing participants.
because your statement about how xenforo had pages and trying to indicate they are the same was not correct?Why would I as I don't use the IPB any more?
<smh>I was just responding factually to the post saying xenForo did not have pages, nothing to do with being comparable.
No, if you read the pos you'll see I didn't say anything or man to imply anything about them being the same. I was just correcting the statement that XenForo doesn't have pages. It does. I wasn't commenting on whether they are the same. Just that there are pages. Simple as that.because your statement about how xenforo had pages and trying to indicate they are the same was not correct?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.