Absolute garbage."Free" isn't really Free if it comes with hoops to jump through, up to and including verifying your xF license data with the 3rd party.
If it doesn't have a monetary cost associated with it, then it's free.
Absolute garbage."Free" isn't really Free if it comes with hoops to jump through, up to and including verifying your xF license data with the 3rd party.
You might check your dictionary. The word encompasses more than monetary cost, such as restrictions, qualifications and obligations. If you have to do something to qualify for the "free" item, it really doesn't fit the definition of the word.Absolute garbage.
If it doesn't have a monetary cost associated with it, then it's free.
You're making a worthless point. You're implying an entitlement to use someone else's work for free, and you disagree with the terms they set out to use their work. They're entitled to request any terms they want for you to use your work (within XenForo's resource guidelines when advertising here of course). It's up to you to decide whether those terms are acceptable to you or not.You're making a worthless comparison.
And I'm sure if the developer decides to use your data in a manner that isn't in compliance with their privacy policy and data protection law the same would happen. And on top of XF taking action, they'd be liable to action from a data protection authority. The consequences are more clear and worse. In the history of XF add-ons I do not recall a case where a developer had a data breach, or used data in an unauthorised manner. ******* would be the closest to it, and although I don't know the details of his case, afaik the issue with him didn't include that.But which if it does happen to do so, WILL be detected and that Dev will lose his privileges to post addons at xF dot com. It's happened before.
Then I don't understand your stake in this issue. You don't use those add-ons, great, so you have no problems here? Fantastic.I don't. Never have, never will.
You might want to check the XF add resource page.You might check your dictionary. The word encompasses more than monetary cost, such as restrictions, qualifications and obligations. If you have to do something to qualify for the "free" item, it really doesn't fit the definition of the word.
Much much more difficult to detect or prove, don't you see?And I'm sure if the developer decides to use your data in a manner that isn't in compliance with their privacy policy and data protection law the same would happen.
No one is forcing them to offer anything for free. But they do. It's simply a semantics issue, it is NOT "free" if it requires jumping through the hoops. See my post above.You're implying an entitlement to use someone else's work for free, and you disagree with the terms they set out to use their work.
Just stating my opinion. Kind of what discussion boards are for.Then I don't understand your stake in this issue. You don't use those add-ons, great, so you have no problems here? Fantastic.
That statement while accurate is also deflective. xF is a PAID platform. It's not advertised as free in any way.Usage of anything has restrictions on it. Read the license of the software you use. Your point is gravely wrong.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.