btmgreg
Well-known member
Not really sure where this fits, it's more of a suggestion for Xenforo.com rather than the software itself.
The bug reporting node is 21 pages deep, currently. A large amount of them either have no prefixes, or haven't been responded to from a staff member or really has a status, of sorts.
It may be more, my OCD mind that has a problem with this - but it could be so much more tidier. As an end user, I go to that node and just think 'Wow - 21 pages of bugs. That's worrying' - but in reality, there's many variations and categories these threads will fall into. Things such as -
Duplicated
Fixed in xx.xx
Feature bug relates to no longer supported/maintained (such as earlier versions)
In Review
As a staff member whom reviews these, surely you'd want to see it more organised? No way could I begin to know where to look when new threads get added every day and older ones are bumped. I get filters can be used for a reason, but still.
Any ideas @Paul B ?
The bug reporting node is 21 pages deep, currently. A large amount of them either have no prefixes, or haven't been responded to from a staff member or really has a status, of sorts.
It may be more, my OCD mind that has a problem with this - but it could be so much more tidier. As an end user, I go to that node and just think 'Wow - 21 pages of bugs. That's worrying' - but in reality, there's many variations and categories these threads will fall into. Things such as -
Duplicated
Fixed in xx.xx
Feature bug relates to no longer supported/maintained (such as earlier versions)
In Review
As a staff member whom reviews these, surely you'd want to see it more organised? No way could I begin to know where to look when new threads get added every day and older ones are bumped. I get filters can be used for a reason, but still.
Any ideas @Paul B ?
Last edited: