Peggy
Well-known member
So am I. I'm currently wearing sneakers by DanSkin to improve my arch.I'd be happy if I had an arch on my foot. I'm flat-footed.
So am I. I'm currently wearing sneakers by DanSkin to improve my arch.I'd be happy if I had an arch on my foot. I'm flat-footed.
I've generally avoiding anything that tries to improve arch support as they end up giving me more foot problems/pain than doing without.So am I. I'm currently wearing sneakers by DanSkin to improve my arch.
I've generally avoiding anything that tries to improve arch support as they end up giving me more foot problems/pain than doing without.
Nice Jake... those exercise balls are one of the best damn things for sitting on at the computer to build lower back muscles. End up finding muscles popping out of all sorts of places as sitting on them works back and legs... very good for posture and health.
Frequently!Anyone here ventures to the supermarket barefooted to do their weekly shopping?
I'm surprised you don't get refused entry on the grounds of health & safety knowing how namby pamby the UK is these days.Frequently!
Thankfully we got rid of the ridiculous meddling government that was taking us down that path.I'm surprised you don't get refused entry on the grounds of health & safety knowing how namby pamby the UK is these days.
I use to get away with the no shoe part in most places though.Most states/counties/cities in the U.S. still enforce that rule we discussed:
No shirts, no shoes, no service.
You can find some that don't enforce it, but they are few, and far between.
That's down to individual stores and facilities to require and enforce, there's no state legislature that mandates such a policy.Most states/counties/cities in the U.S. still enforce [...] No shirts, no shoes, no service.
I've never completely understood why having no shoes would mean no service you. I can understand in upscale stores or something, but even then I don't recall seeing such a sign on those stores, it's usually some store a lot of people go to wearing nothing special.Most states/counties/cities in the U.S. still enforce that rule we discussed:
No shirts, no shoes, no service.
You can find some that don't enforce it, but they are few, and far between.
It's mostly restaurants, and they consider it a health issue. The department of health mostly pressures restaurants to enforce this rule.I've never completely understood why having no shoes would mean no service you. I can understand in upscale stores or something, but even then I don't recall seeing such a sign on those stores, it's usually some store a lot of people go to wearing nothing special.
That's also a myth actually: http://www.barefooters.org/health-dept/The department of health mostly pressures restaurants to enforce this rule.
That's also a myth actually: http://www.barefooters.org/health-dept/
I've never really understood the thinking behind it. It can't really be the exposed sole, as like Onimua says, feet really can't be any dirtier than shoes, and it can't be the sight of feet, or flip flops would be outlawed too. Just seems like a bit of an arbitrary, random thing with no grounding in common sense or logic.So... if you wrap your barefeet in your shirt, then those stores have to serve you, right?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.