• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

AXIVO Review

Floren

Well-known member
#1
Hi all,

I finally finished the site conversion entirely to XenForo.
AXIVO is a community focused primarily on Linux and Red Hat based distribution knowledge.

Let me know if you find something out of order, thank you for your feedback.
 

Floren

Well-known member
#3
Thanks for the reminder LOL, I forgot to ban hotmail and outlook. :D
On previous forum, I used to get a ton of daily spam from those 2 email services... should I ban them or not?
 

MattW

Well-known member
#4
Thanks for the reminder LOL, I forgot to ban hotmail and outlook. :D
On previous forum, I used to get a ton of daily spam from those 2 email services... should I ban them or not?
I don't use a hotmail or outlook account, it's my own domain using their services ;)
 

Floren

Well-known member
#5
I see, that is nice. :)
I think they marked the email as spam because it is sent from an OVH server, which they used to be known for their high number of spammers.
 

Tracy Perry

Well-known member
#10
Just signed up. Initial e-mail went into Spam using Outlook.com
I'm finding even with DKIM, SPF and DMARC defined, my emails to hotmail/outlook end up going to spam. Every tool I've checked show I've got it set up right, my messages are shown as signed and have RDNS pointing at that server. I'm tempted to just set up another VPS to do nothing but mail for my forums/domains.
 

Floren

Well-known member
#11
@Tracy Perry, I use Google Apps for Domain and the emails are signed properly in my Bind configuration... still he had issues.
Code:
# dig -t TXT axivo.com +short | grep spf
"v=spf1 a:axivo.com include:_spf.google.com ~all"
Email test:
Received: from chronos.axivo.com (chronos.axivo.com. [192.99.2.133])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si1808441qan.216.2014.04.24.01.27.53
for <floren@axivo.com>;
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of noreply@axivo.com designates 192.99.2.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.99.2.133;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of noreply@axivo.com designates 192.99.2.133 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=noreply@axivo.com
Received: by chronos.axivo.com (Postfix, from userid 496)
id C75FE120196; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:27:32 -0400 (EDT)
 

MattW

Well-known member
#12
These are the headers from the mail I received:
Code:
x-store-info:4r51+eLowCe79NzwdU2kR3P+ctWZsO+J
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 192.99.2.133) smtp.mailfrom=noreply@axivo.com; dkim=none header.d=axivo.com; x-hmca=pass header.id=noreply@axivo.com
X-SID-PRA: noreply@axivo.com
X-AUTH-Result: PASS
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-Message-Status: n:n
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MjtHRD0yO1NDTD02
X-Message-Info: 11chDOWqoTkV3Yy27mKzEREYy/Cmofg9ke2kcALd71pxKgn63b1m5m07g177/oYewq7zjV4etFME+8idWwFOX/4UoxfvlnMDC4r1uCPIPkGX7AqFKq1sodgn5mMf0hMQxzOC8lCUOKlGEpfZCHLMntLvAsBSmqGEjAivdpH2OyQCXbwwQtc8c/y5oxq94gnCicn+5RI50rf5H1gl4k2NoVG/J7/Em2hS
Received: from chronos.axivo.com ([192.99.2.133]) by BAY0-PAMC1-F1.Bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4900);
    Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:47:17 -0700
Received: by chronos.axivo.com (Postfix, from userid 496)
    id 8A55312019E; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 05:46:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: MattW <admin@mattwservices.co.uk>
Subject: AXIVO Account Confirmation Required
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:Sendmail.php
From: AXIVO <noreply@axivo.com>
Message-Id: <12330f943fca4b68778a629707b3fa085d7cc865@www.axivo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:46:29 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_69aa9ecc4d8f4b455e42183abbb68d4e"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: noreply@axivo.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2014 09:47:17.0512 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8FEA080:01CF5E0F]
X-EsetId: 37303A2948215B656C7D60
 

Floren

Well-known member
#13
Go figure on Microsoft side, meh:
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass

It should not end in Spam.

Now, I see no comments about the website? :giggle:
 

Tracy Perry

Well-known member
#15
These are the headers from the mail I received:
Hotmail sucks...
Notice the DKIM in it?
Code:
x-store-info:qAUQJzZ73IJCLUJ+0n7ZQ0FF2dY/LDjE
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 107.182.130.21) smtp.mailfrom=root@servinglinux.com; dkim=permerror header.d=servinglinux.com; x-hmca=pass header.id=root@servinglinux.com
X-SID-PRA: root@servinglinux.com
X-AUTH-Result: PASS
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-Message-Status: n:n
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MztHRD0zO1NDTD02
X-Message-Info: 6YO/4nwP5t0l9OEwx9nXrBAzUdT73gUlf++OV2cRIPeO78O024DNnZkWiV6hSmtWFZF1jtwcV93YSSr/MFoM/4YToAVGFHA9AeoZ+qQc4J8d9zXSDgMQKHZg3p4WaR/W8p4nGwU+Ahc6Krl+WAWD1XoEkQ3bD5LOFIixd5F00D5GzncB8rTnarKmIKT6mYKF6tQTFLDbofkssIo+64EaSbNpmngYImpA
Received: from servinglinux.com ([107.182.130.21]) by SNT0-MC4-F32.Snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4900);
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:33:39 -0700
Received: by servinglinux.com (Postfix, from userid 0)
id F2FE49454A8; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:33:38 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=servinglinux.com;
s=mail; t=1398306818;
bh=xsgPqDQ84Aet7LcXpuPnfvvOlSvyELIflKcjQ1OUtZw=;
h=To:Subject:Date:From:From;
b=KixkWvqSP0BKFqj7NZ8kEnCf7HLrm2TvuOlhp67DQ6RviTHBGJGWsq0BWizup6Apo
4uZ0bKN/xZrs3oYk4cptuYSQRiFUu5/9eTkolg5NO2/azm/chHuvhbdOl0w3txI5CH
SR0syKyuvA4dk+914X9izlanJOhPfRbqZRj9z/r8=
To: tdperry45@hotmail.com
Subject: Test
Message-Id: <20140424023338.F2FE49454A8@servinglinux.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:33:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: root@servinglinux.com (root)
Return-Path: root@servinglinux.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2014 02:33:39.0099 (UTC) FILETIME=[99A35EB0:01CF5F65]
 

Tracy Perry

Well-known member
#17
Problem is... there is no outbound gateway. That server sends direct. :cautious::X3:
Now it's getting a time-out error.
Code:
Apr 24 04:40:07 bart postfix/pickup[24031]: DFCE8945488: uid=1000 from=<tracy>
Apr 24 04:40:07 bart postfix/cleanup[310]: DFCE8945488: message-id=<20140424094007.DFCE8945488@servinglinux.com>
Apr 24 04:40:07 bart opendkim[2677]: DFCE8945488: DKIM-Signature header added (s=mail, d=servinglinux.com)
Apr 24 04:40:07 bart postfix/qmgr[32105]: DFCE8945488: from=<tracy@servinglinux.com>, size=363, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 24 04:41:08 bart postfix/smtp[312]: DFCE8945488: to=<tdperry45@hotail.com>, relay=none, delay=60, delays=0.05/0/60/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to hotail.com[64.4.6.100]:25: Connection timed out)
 

Tracy Perry

Well-known member
#18
On a related note... like the site but I'm not a big fan of that much blue.
For me, blue has been done to death and I like to see something a little different (but I'm a fine one to talk, my Linux site is basically black/gray, white and orange with a smattering of other colors in it.:whistle:
 

Floren

Well-known member
#19
Problem is... there is no outbound gateway. That server sends direct. :cautious::X3:
Now it's getting a time-out error.
I probably misunderstand what you are trying to do... please open a new thread into Server Configuration, or else people will think we bump this thread in purpose. :D
On a related note... like the site but I'm not a big fan of that much blue.
For me, blue has been done to death and I like to see something a little different (but I'm a fine one to talk, my Linux site is basically black/gray, white and orange with a smattering of other colors in it.:whistle:
Thank you for the comments, I appreciate it... finally a review. :)
I would appreciate if others members will express their opinion also.
 

MattW

Well-known member
#20
I really like what you are doing with the resources, and the uni-formality of the layout / structure of them.

Theme wise, I don't mind all the blue, but then again, I'm used to being on here quite a bit, so feels really familiar.