That's the point though. All you have to do is show up once every 45 days if you want to keep getting paid.That is the dumbest thing ever. How about you create something, ask money for it and people decide to open source it or hand it for free ?
That's the point though. All you have to do is show up once every 45 days if you want to keep getting paid.That is the dumbest thing ever. How about you create something, ask money for it and people decide to open source it or hand it for free ?
Not if it's part of the agreement when you post your software for sale.That would surely cause legal issues.
The free ones are “up”. Only paid ones have been deleted.
We do provide a reason:When addons are deleted for whatever reason, why cant it simply be stated that its due to housekeeping - 45 day rule etc. Current housekeeping just deletes the addon with no reason provided.
This resource has been deleted by XenForo Ltd. in line with our resource housekeeping criteria.
ok, but is that criteria easy to find by anyone? I've never seen it. Just helps to be transparent with the rules, is all.We do provide a reason:
Before posting a resource you must agree to the terms and guidelines and standardsok, but is that criteria easy to find by anyone? I've never seen it. Just helps to be transparent with the rules, is all.
Ah yes sorry, those are the terms/guidelines for resources themselves not for the resource developer.Ok, but where does it say 45 days there? A search for "45" doesn't find it.
Well, that'd certainly be one way to drive off the remaining vendors offering paid XF add-ons.Not if it's part of the agreement when you post your software for sale.
- maintain it
- after 45 days of no checking in, it will transition to free/open source for that version.
seems pretty simple to me.
It's what most other 'things' do. you 'buy' the latest and greatest features, you community edition the old version. If you want to get paid again, update it to something worth buying and maintain it going forward.
just ideas.
Previously we have not disclosed the specifics because we didn't want resource authors doing the bare minimum just to keep their resources listed.
The thread Brogan links has the full policy, and only lacked specifics, which have been changed over the years. Those same specifics have mostly been known, and it was likely oversight to clarify them. I've have never actively looked for the specifics but was aware of them (mostly).This defies all logic. We keep the requirements hidden because we don't want the resource authors to know them.
No matter what we do we can't win.
No matter what we do we can't win.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.