Mr Lucky
Well-known member
It included important new features such as GDPR cookie consent.2.2.12 is a patch, the actual release of XF 2.2 was in September 2020.
It included important new features such as GDPR cookie consent.2.2.12 is a patch, the actual release of XF 2.2 was in September 2020.
Can't find the post, because it's from 10+ years ago, but think it is because USD is still the most widely used currency globally.I've used many forum software suites over the years, and XF is still the best IMO... No idea though why they use USD and not GBP as there a British company not American?
You are in the position where you can create the code that you need and have done so for XF1. Having time to do so is another factor. But there also are admins that are relying on essential XF1 addon functionality that is not available for XF2 and therefore are stuck on XF1. In this sense it is a factor of missing functionality. I agree with your point though: its not a matter of XF2 not being better than XF1. XF2 is better than XF1. And there also are many interesting addons or addon upgrades available for XF2, that offer new value. If I could upgrade, then I would.I doubt that. Sites that are still on XF1 vs. XF2 or vB3/vB4 vs vB5 has very little to do with them waiting for some super great feature before they pay for a year worth of upgrades. I'd say the vast majority of those sites are probably sitting on a ton of custom code that would need to be rewritten for the new version/framework (and no feature in XF 2.3 is going to solve that for them). I know firsthand because I'd love to pay for a year of upgrades and be able to click a button and all the custom code is magically rewritten for XF2. I have 2 sites that are still on XF1 because of that (one is at least XF 1.5, but the other is still on 1.4 because even getting it to 1.5 is a crazy amount of work).
There is a TON of great things XF 2.2 does when you compare it to 1.4 or 1.5. It's not an issue of "no features worth upgrading for".
Indeed. Anything that I am not paying in CAD is USD. Even some Canadian and all GB and EU companies I deal with bill me in USD. My writing competition awards are in USD and those sites are UK as well. That applies to work, my site, and life. And I like it that way. Means I have only one exchange rate to worry about when budgeting and planning.Can't find the post, because it's from 10+ years ago, but think it is because USD is still the most widely used currency globally.
BTW... the data/charts have moved. They still exist on digitalpoint.com, but the formulas and stuff don't get updated there anymore. At some point I'm going to turn them off. The new location gets the latest and greatest data/formulas.
Commercial forum
Year | Change vs. previous year |
---|---|
2014 | 0% (baseline... first full year of data) |
2015 | +3% |
2016 | +23% |
2017 | +12% |
2018 | +11% |
2019 | +21% |
2020 | +47% |
2021 | +7% |
2022 | +2% |
2023 | +3% |
Thank you for taking the time as always. Much much appreciated.So just to answer your question, this is what it sees year to year for XenForo (percentages are compared to the previous year, not since the beginning):
I mean from the table alone one can't deduce one or the other. My guess is a lot of boards migrated in the last years to XF which is why XF's marketshare grew and which is why it never saw a decline relative to a previous year.
But, but, forums are dying ... apparently ...
That is also what I am guessing but to confirm it we need raw numbers ofc. I don't know, I already accepted the fate that we are in a sinking boat. I am just curious in about how deep we are, but knowing it or not won't change anything anyway. As one customer we can't steer the ship, just witness what's happening, it is not in our hands.Judging from the percentage decline being larger than the percentage XenForo is gaining, I'd say it's safe to say that the cumulative number of sites as a whole running "forum" software is in fact going down.
This is an interesting take. I know that in many occasions you and other devs praised the framework, especially since the re-write. But I thought you and your sites are exceptions. Like ofc you can turn this framework into something which has nothing to do with a forum yet use it as an engine to run other type of sites. But from what I understand now it is flexible enough for it not to be just an exception but with the right strategy the "forum software" could expand into other "software" territories. But I think we are already behind with current developments for the "forum" part that this kind of tackle will never happen since they don't have enough men I guess. But would have been interesting and maybe revitalize things, especially get back more devs into the eco-system.That being said, XenForo has built a pretty unbelievable framework... Someday maybe they will pivot and think of themselves as software to run a site that happens to be able to also run a forum vs. forum software that happens to be able to run a site.
No, my sites aren't exceptions. Almost all sites use some sort of framework these days. They are endless and honestly most of them aren't that great either. But starting from something rather than nothing is better than nothing. Literally the only reason more sites don't use it purely as a framework is because no one knows how good it is for being a framework because XenForo just keeps telling people it's "forum software". Wrong!This is an interesting take. I know that in many occasions you and other devs praised the framework, especially since the re-write. But I thought you and your sites are exceptions. Like ofc you can turn this framework into something which has nothing to do with a forum yet use it as an engine to run other type of sites. But from what I understand now it is flexible enough for it not to be just an exception but with the right strategy the "forum software" could expand into other "software" territories. But I think we are already behind with current developments for the "forum" part that this kind of tackle will never happen since they don't have enough men I guess. But would have been interesting and maybe revitalize things, especially get back more devs into the eco-system.
Maybe they are not, but you are . You could build a website with just matchsticks probably. I mean we can send any framework, anything towards your direction and you could build upon that. So when you say sth. like that I am thinking in my head "is the framework really that good or is it because he is so good ". But from what you tell now it seems that the framework is that good (we normal humans don't get to realize that since we don't understand what is happening under the hood). Expanding the reputation of XF into other markets would be a win-win for all of us if it happened. Maybe that is exactly what we need to save the ship. To be honest I am game with any "innovation", anything "new", any new "direction". At least seeing something being tried on would suffice for me but we all know how slow it is these days so don't need to dream here . Thanks though, interesting take.No, my sites aren't exceptions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.