xenforo.com server

[Anton_Bodryachkom]

enjoying reading all that

 

[WSWD]

Couldn't you just run raid 10 SSD with more disks?

We already run 8 drive RAID10 arrays in most of them, and have experimented with 16+ in test servers just for fun.

You're literally talking 40+ drives on a 20 core server to come close to the same i/o. That's just stupid at that point. No way are we going to put 40 drives in a server just to say we run a 20 core box. Makes no sense financially or otherwise.

 

[Moscato]

fair point

too many parts increases likelihood any given part will fail

 

[Anton_Bodryachkom]

Can you guys take a look at Opcache , what can be tweeked

 

[Moscato]

Looks fine.

The primary thing to pay attention with opcache is memory usage, assuming hits are over 95% You're wasting a tiny bit with it being 73% free.

Still, gives you room to grow

 

[Sheratan]

xcache is slower than zend opcache for PHP processing.

Any links about this?

All xcache - opcache - whatever cache bench is almost different from time to time. Sometimes xcache wins, sometimes opcache wins, etc etc.

I like opcache, but xcache has opcode + data/session, and opcache is not.

ps: I never had this "session cache hash slamming" in 1,5 years using xcache (compiled, not via yum/apt-get)

 

[Moscato]

Any links about this?

All xcache - opcache - whatever cache bench is almost different from time to time. Sometimes xcache wins, sometimes opcache wins, etc etc.

I like opcache, but xcache has opcode + data/session, and opcache is not.

ps: I never had this "session cache hash slamming" in 1,5 years using xcache (compiled, not via yum/apt-get)

http://massivescale.blogspot.com/2013/06/php-55-zend-optimiser-opcache-vs-xcache.html

This is a bit dated, and is 5.5

As to user data cache, you can use memcached just fine

If you just want an all in one solution, xcache is fine I suppose