Anthony Parsons
Well-known member
Be careful interpreting linode stats with memory. Free -m at the CLI is more accurate. Longview shows MYSQL buffer cache and FPM as used, where the CLI shows exact allocation.
To be fair cpanel has features that some web stacks don't which are server resource intensive like everything to do with email, spamassasin and if you enable it clamav anti-virus scanning etc - all essential stuff if you operate email MTA server (exim) locally on your server. But yes Nginx will use less resources that Apache in most cases.I nosed around the Longview app on my Linode console........................ holy crap! This cPanel install IS a bloated pig lol!! I had no idea it used so much of my resources!
Well, I had noticed the memory use in Longview "never" went below 18%-20% when I had cPanel installed. Without it, free -m shows barely 3% used. That's huge! Of course, I didn't measure the free -m with cPanel before I deleted the last node, but will try to remember to do that on a future creation. I gotta say................ I'm having a great time learning the ins and outs of this stuff! I'll get to that Centmin mod before I'm through, too.Be careful interpreting linode stats with memory. Free -m at the CLI is more accurate. Longview shows MYSQL buffer cache and FPM as used, where the CLI shows exact allocation.
I joined your forums. Hoping to get this installed shortly.To be fair cpanel has features that some web stacks don't which are server resource intensive like everything to do with email, spamassasin and if you enable it clamav anti-virus scanning etc - all essential stuff if you operate email MTA server (exim) locally on your server. But yes Nginx will use less resources that Apache in most cases.
Installing NGINX as a reverse proxy is pretty much useless, to be honest. Just use cloud flare, it does the same thing except gives you full CDN. NGINX as a reverse proxy does not solve the apache bloat. It resolves some aspects, but you may as well just use NGINX as the sole web server.What I find intriguing is using nginx in front of apache. Any of you all doing that?
OpenLiteSpeed has many of the benefits of LiteSpeed... the main exceptions being that it won't ready the .htaccess, it can't be used (last I checked) with cPanel and it's .htaccess equivalent directives can be slightly different than what one is used to with Apache (you have to place them in the vhost definition).Lightspeed by itself as the web server would have killed apache... but they didn't, so NGINX is killing apache, year on year.
in future Centmin Mod users will be able to choose between Nginx, LiteSpeed and OpenLiteSpeedI ran it for a while and it was OK, but I honestly preferred nginx.
Figured it was just a matter of time since OLS has gone with a heavy emphasis on the text config files.in future Centmin Mod users will be able to choose between Nginx, LiteSpeed and OpenLiteSpeed
yup there's a reason for itFigured it was just a matter of time since OLS has gone with a heavy emphasis on the text config files.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.