I know this. I was making a point: the big companies which are behind net neutrality don't favor nuetral practices, they favor being able to push large amounts of their bandwidth through ISPs, having ISPs bear the costs rather than them.
Choosing another service it the beauty of a free market, not a highly regulated market.
Again, not the point.
Google and Facebook (rightfully so) are allowed to filter, produce, prioritize and sell their services based on the free market. But apply free market to ISPs, and suddenly everyone is in an uproar. I shouldn't have to pay for my neighbor using 100x more bandwidth because he streams 24x7 and downloads countless gigabytes via torrents. Let's call Net Neutrality it what it really is: government regulation.