Watermarker [Deleted]

[Deleted member 232995]

0815 updated Watermarker with a new update entry:

1.0.0 Beta 6

add - several new variables for watermark text, currentYear, uploadDate and uploadYear

fixed - ICC profiles are now preserved. Previously, the loss caused colour incorrectness in images that had embedded ICC profiles.

Read the rest of this update entry...

 

[Faust]

Just downloaded, can’t find new options . Any advice ?

 

[mcatze]

Just downloaded, can’t find new options . Any advice ?

What options do you expect to see? In the last update there were not any new options implemented.

 

[Faust]

What options do you expect to see? In the last update there were not any new options implemented.

All good. Is there.

 

[Firarist]

Thanks @0815 , great plugin. I don't want it to work with previously submitted attachments. Is there any way to handle this?

 

[otto]

I don't want it to work with previously submitted attachments.

Why? I mean that is one of the best things from this addon. You can every time change the watermark and never lose original picture data.

But there is a other addon (https://xenforo.com/community/resources/tl-watermark.7380/) for watermarks that only touch new pictures.
But I don't know it leaves the original pictures untouched or read and saves them with the watermark.

 

[Deleted member 232995]

Thanks @0815 , great plugin. I don't want it to work with previously submitted attachments. Is there any way to handle this?

This is not possible with this add-on and I do not think that this would be a useful extension for this add-on.

 

[Firarist]

Thanks for the explanation. Previously, the forum name was written manually on 50000 pictures. The same content is displayed on the images twice.

 

[Deleted member 232995]

Ahh, I see, I hadn't thought of it from that point of view... This is definitely a consideration, a thought I hadn't had yet. What about attachments that have a fixed watermark. Therefore, I revise my statement. There are good reasons for such a thing.

 

[Firarist]

The free offering of this plugin is really cool and it works perfectly. I hope this feature will be added in the future.

 

[otto]

the forum name was written manually on 50000 pictures

Oh, Ok - that's a good reason.

 

[Deleted member 232995]

0815 updated Watermarker with a new update entry:

1.0.0 Beta 7

add - Option to work only from a certain attachment ID. For example, to avoid duplicate watermarks on images with watermarks that are already burnt in.

Read the rest of this update entry...

 

[Firarist]

This plugin is great. Thank you so much. Now it meets all needs.

 

[Deleted member 232995]

This plugin is great. Thank you so much. Now it meets all needs.

I'm glad to read that everything works.

I would be very happy to receive a review or/and a donation.

 

[Joe Link]

Is there any way to run this without nearly doubling the size of our image storage? I'm guessing the answer is no, but I figured I'd ask, since we now have two directories over 100GB (attachments and watermarker)

 

[Deleted member 232995]

Is there any way to run this without nearly doubling the size of our image storage? I'm guessing the answer is no, but I figured I'd ask, since we now have two directories over 100GB (attachments and watermarker)

Hello,

yes, there are pros and cons to everything... With this version, where the original image is not changed, it is the worst case, double used memory.

However, this add-on has a cron that is supposed to delete old files. Based on the option "Image cache refresh".
However, depending on the project, it may well be that deleting once a day is not enough. In this case, the cron should be edited and set to hourly, for example.

 

[Joe Link]

yes, there are pros and cons to everything... With this version, where the original image is not changed, it is the worst case, double used memory.

Ok, that's what I figured

However, this add-on has a cron that is supposed to delete old files. Based on the option "Image cache refresh".
However, depending on the project, it may well be that deleting once a day is not enough. In this case, the cron should be edited and set to hourly, for example.

When you say "old files", what exactly are you referring to?

 

[Viracocha]

Greetings for this resource. Is possible to have different watermark options (image) for different user groups? Thanx!

 

[Deleted member 232995]

Greetings for this resource. Is possible to have different watermark options (image) for different user groups? Thanx!

I'll give it some thought

 

[adnanbcn]

Can you add a new variable option {currentusername}?

At this moment > We can use variable {forum}, {username}, {currentYear}, {uploadYear} or {uploadDate}.

Some time it’s very useful to add a watermark to check which user download and share a photo. You can check, if is a login user to add {currentusername} else board name or empty.

Thanks for yours great add-on.