1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

XF 1.5 PHP 7

Discussion in 'XenForo Questions and Support' started by Valkyrius Magni, Dec 3, 2015.

  1. Valkyrius Magni

    Valkyrius Magni New Member

    I was reading an article about speeding up Xenforo. And one of it says that I should use PHP 7 if possible.

    I have it in cPanel. Should I put a check on everything?
     
  2. MattW

    MattW Well-Known Member

    PHP7 is almost 50% faster than the previous versions. I moved my site over to a server running RC7

    upload_2015-12-3_2-56-29.png
     
    Mike Creuzer, Fred. and Daniel Hood like this.
  3. Valkyrius Magni

    Valkyrius Magni New Member

    @MattW isn't LiteSpeed faster than Nginx?
     
  4. MattW

    MattW Well-Known Member

    Depends. The above isn't really a fair comparison between nginx and Litespeed, because I've not tried PHP7 with Litespeed yet.
     
  5. MattW

    MattW Well-Known Member

    @Amin Sabet actually got better results from Apache2.4 with mod_pagespeed with Litespeed on his server. We've recently flattened that server, and moved to nginx / php7 and he's getting even better results. Will really need to wait for PHP7 to come into cPanel before I can do a fair comparison myself.
     
  6. Valkyrius Magni

    Valkyrius Magni New Member

    It was actually his article that I was reading.

    Are you guys using Cloudflare/MaxCDN? I want to use both altogether and might consider getting the Railgun option if we ever get big.
     
  7. MattW

    MattW Well-Known Member

    He's using KeyCDN yes. Not Cloudflare.
     
  8. Valkyrius Magni

    Valkyrius Magni New Member

    I see. But I also read in Google that using Cloudflare and another CDN of choice is the optimal path. Right? Since you're getting the best of both worlds.
     
  9. MattW

    MattW Well-Known Member

    I don't know in all honesty. I've tried Cloudflare many times myself, and never been very impressed with them. Amin isn't using them currently (using DNSMadeEasy for DNS), and we have HTTP/2 working with nginx. Cloudflare only offers SPDY.
     
  10. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet Well-Known Member

    I've tested my sites over and over again. Been a bit obsessed with performance. I can tell you that in my case, like Matt said, I am getting faster performance than ever before with Nginx via Centminmod and KeyCDN (and http/2, PHP7, Memcached, etc).

    I wouldn't mind paying for LiteSpeed Webserver if it gave me better results, but it did not. My start render times (based on Webpagetest.org) actually seemed faster with Apache + mod_pagespeed than with LSWS. This fellow found something similar: https://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/threads/performance.1101/

    With all of these things, YMMV. I've no doubt that LSWS is faster than Apache and/or Nginx for some people depending on their needs, server specs, etc.

    I've had mixed results with CloudFlare. It definitely sped up my site when I was using the XenForo image proxy. Not sure why. But I'm not using it now, and my sites have never been faster. I never tried Railgun. Wasn't an option on the "Pro" plan.

    Not sure why you'd want to use both CloudFlare and another CDN. Not for speed at least. Possibly for some of the CloudFlare security features, but I was getting false positives with those and decided to turn them off anyway.
     
    Robust and MattW like this.
  11. thedude

    thedude Well-Known Member

    CloudFlare just announced support for HTTP/2
     
  12. Robust

    Robust Well-Known Member

    As of this week, it offers HTTP/2 as well in conjunction with SPDY ;)

    Never been a huge fan of CF myself, but I still use it.
     
  13. Alfa1

    Alfa1 Well-Known Member

    Did you turn on LiteSpeed Cache? It speeds up my big board a lot. My big board will not even run on Apache, unless I throw more servers at it.

    The benchmarks I have seen so far put it on par with NGINX.
     
  14. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet Well-Known Member

    I didn't use LiteSpeed Cache. I used that with vBulletin before switching to XenForo and had small issues with it that kept me from trying it with XenForo. I'm mostly interested in site performance for members anyway.

    I have a lot of server relative to the activity of my sites. That's probably why I was okay with Apache.
     

Share This Page