PageSpeed Insights

[Masetrix]

There are more needed

Website Security Test | ImmuniWeb

Test your website security and compliance, scan for outdated and vulnerable software, audit HTTP security headers and web server security, check your Content Security Policy

www.immuniweb.com

Did some more tweaking and upgraded to PHP 8.
Mobile:

It can be better. )

The goal should not be to get to 100

I guess that's true.

You shouldn't just test the TLD, i.e. the homepage of a domain. You can only illuminate really meaningful values if you enter a link to a topic in PageSpeed. So with advertising, as your guests will see.

 

[djbaxter]

who would eliminate images in the age of lazy loading? it's about reducing the size of css, js, and woff2 files packed with unused stuff.

It was an example meant to illustrate that removing features just to decrease page load time is a really bad idea.

 

[duderuud]

There are more needed

Website Security Test | ImmuniWeb

Test your website security and compliance, scan for outdated and vulnerable software, audit HTTP security headers and web server security, check your Content Security Policy

www.immuniweb.com

I guess that's true.

You shouldn't just test the TLD, i.e. the homepage of a domain. You can only illuminate really meaningful values if you enter a link to a topic in PageSpeed. So with advertising, as your guests will see.
View attachment 250858

All external links (G Analytics, Adsense, etc) kill your page speed. We only use Analytics, we stopped using (tracker) ads all together.

 

[Max Taxable]

It was an example meant to illustrate that removing features just to decrease page load time is a really bad idea.

Should definitely optimize images instead of removing them. Roger that!

 

[Kirby]

Should definitely optimize images instead of removing them. Roger that!

Not necessarily. Even fully optimized, "lazy-loading" images in initial viewport do take time to download and render and thus negatively affect FCP/LCP.

Why should't such images be removed to improve loading speed if they are not really necessary?

A perfect example are avatars.
Does a guest visiting through a SERP really care if there are avatar images (instead of just letters)?

Most likely not, he is looking for an answer to a question and not for avatars of people he doesn't know anyway so those images are not important and in fact might even be distractive.

 

[Max Fridman]

Hello guys, im here for some help about PageSpeed optimization:

Homepage: https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https://www.inforge.net/forum/
Homepage GTmetrix: https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/Se0AmN9F/

Thread: https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsit...yperfund-guadagno-reale-o-soldi-persi.600373/
Thread: GTmetrix: https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/fSRzflty/

We are already working on:

• Reducing iubenda impact
• Removing avatars for guests

Something else?

 

[duderuud]

Looks like your host causes the biggest problem. Initial response is really slow.

 

[Max Fridman]

Looks like your host causes the biggest problem. Initial response is really slow.

Maybe the firewall slows everything down.

 

[Anatoliy]

Maybe the firewall slows everything down.

your misconfigured cdn slows everything down big time

 

[Kirby]

your misconfigured cdn slows everything down big time

Yep, definitly. I'd go back to a clean configuration without mod_pagespeed and to optimize from there.

 

[Max Fridman]

Thanks for the help ill work on it, let's see what i can do

 

[djbaxter]

Yep, definitly. I'd go back to clean configuration without mod_pagespeed and to optimize from there.

I have tried mod_pagespeed twice (two digfferent versions) over the past year or so. It just slows everything down. They really should be calling it mod_page-slower-than-molasses-in winter.

 

[Max Fridman]

Realistically for a site big as ours and customized as ours how much we could optimize performances? i runned audits on similar sites and they are worst than us in terms of performance score.

 

[Anatoliy]

Realistically for a site big as ours and customized as ours how much we could optimize performances?

what do you see here?

 

[Max Fridman]

what do you see here?

View attachment 251053

Well our CDN is sleeping probably

 

[Max Fridman]

Homepage: https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https://www.inforge.net/forum/
Homepage GTmetrix: https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/Se0AmN9F/

Thread: https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsit...yperfund-guadagno-reale-o-soldi-persi.600373/
Thread: GTmetrix: https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/fSRzflty/

Still working on it:

• Homepage GTmetrix (after fix): https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/8nxRfquG/
• Thread GTmetrix (after fix): https://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.inforge.net/4zuv01LF/

We will deploy more optimizations in the next few days. Keep in mind that tests are from Canada but our server is located in Europe. Tests from London show better times.

Ill update when we will deploy more changes eventually, thanks to everyone

 

[Kirby]

Still a lot to do ...

• Configure Expires/Cache-Control
• Remove the redirects for FA files
• Reduce total payload (optimize images)

 

[Anatoliy]

fa-duotone-900.woff2 - 10,320ms

 

[Max Fridman]

Still a lot to do ...

• Configure Expires/Cache-Control
• Remove the redirects for FA files
• Reduce total payload (optimize images)

Still working on those

Thanks for the reply with the issues so we can add them in our issue tracker

 

[Max Fridman]

Another round of optimizations done:

• Homepage (WebPageTest): https://www.webpagetest.org/result/210527_AiDc8J_a31bc462040004965a45c68c96347cc4/
• Thread (WebPageTest): https://www.webpagetest.org/result/210527_AiDcKG_e2dce82a212b2cba8fd8b298f08bef44/

90% of our urls are now "Page Experience Friendly" for Google Search Console, without AMP. We are working to reduce the CLS and optimize LCP.