snoopy5
Well-known member
- Affected version
- MG 2.1rc
The watermark can be removed using inline moderation.
A larger image can be viewed by opening the image itself in a new tab.
You can access inline moderation in the usual way.
Opening an image in a new tab is standard browser functionality. Right click on the image > Open in new tab.
I don't know what else to say. You can access inline moderation via the checkbox on the media itself or through the "Select for moderation" checkbox on the media tools menu (the button with three dots).Maybe I am blind, but if I look at the image after having clicked on it, I can not see any kind of inline moderation available. I do not see neither any other way where it could be.
We don't have a row of toolbar buttons anymore so there's nowhere to put such a thing. Plus it's just a button that already duplicates the built in functionality of evey single browser, plus there's a link to the full image already in the share block. You don't have to educate your users on anything. If they don't know how to use a computer properly, that's not really your problem. Another difference from XFMG1 is that the image now "fits" in the viewport so there shouldn't be any part of the image displayed off screen as it was before.I am sorry, but I can hardly believe this. Are you saying that you took away a feature of the old version and now expect that we educate our users on using browser functionalities?
That is an exaggeration at best.95% of internet ussers have no clue about this right-click functionality. And nobody will remember this when visiting a gallery. They look at images and at buttons and descriptions. If it is not there, it does not exist for them.
Sorry it disappoints you but you must be the only "photo oriented" community we have (which is not true) because all of the other many communities using it have been perfectly happy with the functionality and the featureset in XFMG 2.x.I do not get it, why the decision about features in a Media Gallery are not reflecting photo-oriented userneeds. I am sorry if I sound harsh and unsatisfied, but I test and compare since two days now this software for many hours beside a normal day job and I hardly see any progress in the feature list of MG over the last 5 years since I looked the last time at it.
Hopefully over time the product will evolve in line with your expectations. For now, it is what it is and we (as do most of our customers) seem happy with what we currently have so there's little point in us discussing it further.I am really disappointed. For 65$ plus yearly renewal fee I would have expected a lot more progress.
I think this is potentially worth reiterating. In a "normal" setup (excepting a very large window I believe), generally speaking, the image is allowed to take up most of the viewport, which is fairly similar in overall size to what would be displayed in a lightbox or full screen (it is potentially slightly smaller due to padding). Compared to XFMG 1.x, which had a sidebar which would commonly limit the image size.Another difference from XFMG1 is that the image now "fits" in the viewport so there shouldn't be any part of the image displayed off screen as it was before.
Hopefully over time the product will evolve in line with your expectations. For now, it is what it is and we (as do most of our customers) seem happy with what we currently have so there's little point in us discussing it further.
.... or through the "Select for moderation" checkbox on the media tools menu (the button with three dots).
I don't know what else to say. You can access inline moderation via the checkbox on the media itself ...
The "inline moderation" appears when you're viewing multiple items, not the single item. In your example view your "People" album and then when viewing the list of thumbnails hover your mouse over the thumbnail.Maybe I am too dumb, but I do not find that alternative. See my screenshot.
A better solution really is to post suggestions in the XFMG Suggestions forum. If other people agree with your suggestions and like them, this will help the developers see what really needs adding (whether a completely new feature or something that has been previously removed).Although I do criticise, which looks at first sight dumb, this is the only way to help and to improve a product. If everybody "plays" happy, because its too much effort for them to write about it, nothing will change.
Another reason is as discussed here.... that for some forums their community has ended up using attachments in the forums over using the gallery. Something I'm running into is that it seems the 'camera crowd' (for lack of a better name) prefers something as simple & straight-forward as possible, such as make a post, attach their images, click save, talk about it. Having to first go to the gallery, add the images there, then go back to the forums and figure out how to insert the gallery embed tags (even if it is as easy as clicking the editor icon) is not something they want to do. Because of that I, along with others I'm aware of, end up looking at how to make posting attachments in posts as seamless & easy as possible while the gallery install sees little usage.I suspect that some owners of XFMG are still on XF 1.x and have yet to move to XF2 (for various reasons including waiting on add-ons or waiting for XF 2.1). It's only as people move over to the new version do they discover features that are missing that were in XFMG 1.x, such as this:
But I have to confirm that the majority of my users have never heard of right-clicking. Of course, the very young, experienced internet generation
In any case, I will have to change the template to get the largest possible image display for the screen by clicking on the image.
is that you can't surf over the single users. Sure, you have links to user albums on the profile pages and the MemberCard and you can search in the Gallery for an album of a user.
But there is no filter, no overview (as in PhotoPost), with which you can easily see the users as 1x thumb each and thus browse pages alphabetically (option: chronologically sorted by newest picture in an album) through the users and when opening the thumb of the user see all their albums and images. Or do I still oversee it?
Even some experienced users needed to be educated.We don't have a row of toolbar buttons anymore so there's nowhere to put such a thing. Plus it's just a button that already duplicates the built in functionality of evey single browser, plus there's a link to the full image already in the share block. You don't have to educate your users on anything. If they don't know how to use a computer properly, that's not really your problem. Another difference from XFMG1 is that the image now "fits" in the viewport so there shouldn't be any part of the image displayed off screen as it was before.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.