Peggy
in memoriam 2016
I believe he is referring to this post -
Expensive hobby indeed - a cleaning session of my smaller lenses a few weeks ago:
Expensive hobby indeed - a cleaning session of my smaller lenses a few weeks ago:
Shelley ... I don't have a jealous bone in my body.Coming from the expert, touch of the green eyed monster I'd say.
Shelley ... I don't have a jealous bone in my body.
You've really missed the mark here.
As well, if you read carefully .... I was defending a photographer's right to want ... not need. "It's not a matter of need, it's want!". An extremely envious "green-eyed" monster would be more likely to question a person's excesses than defend them.
On a more thankful note, it seems you are really caring about my unmet needs. That I might resort to jealousy to deal with my painful unmet desires.
I do have good news on this matter. I have a wonderful wife, son, and life !
Thanks for caring so much !!!!!!
To the average person, many specialized jobs are overlooked by the output (quality) where to an expert in that field they know the tools, add-ons they use add that little extra to the final product. I guess it's a case of educating people whom are not savy with specialized subjects/equipment whatever it may be. I know nothing about photography, but I suspect anyone purchasing equipment ranging into the thousands they know that each add-on (lenses) as it's special functionality to get that 100% desired result.
But your missing one important thing, Kier doesn't do photography as professional job.
Yes, he does.
It obviously is not his only professional job, but he does do professional photography.
Forsaken's use of Never.
Never eh ?
MEH.
Hobby. I never quoted or was talking to Kier. I quoted Andy.N.
ooo didn't know Kier's a Canon guy. I'm a Nikon fan here![]()
I am not an expert, or even a novice, in photography, but the retail value of that collection is probably in the 30-ish thousand dollars. I also don't know how much photographers make, but I can imagine that the "million dollar shot" (no, not the money shot, you pervs!) is pretty damn rare. So for the average professional it would take time (years?) to get a return on investment on those, though I suppose one could argue that they don't depreciate much, still, unless you bring in the cost of the equipment it's really a hobby and not work.Also, thousands of dollars of equipment when you use it for work = need.
On the contrary, the average wedding shoot will bring in well in excess of $1,000 and sometimes a lot more. When working as a professional photographer (by which I mean being paid to work, rather than any comment on primary occupation) it does not take forever to recover the equipment outlay.for the average professional it would take time (years?) to get a return on investment on those
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.