Arantor
Well-known member
I made no such claims. I merely asked the room if this was acceptable or not, without suggesting my own thoughts either way on the matter. My core point - which you seem to have missed - is that there are some spectacular examples of double standards at work about 'censorship', and about material that until recently was apparently above review or suspicion.You realize that this conversation can be interpreted as supporting this in libraries too, right?
I also point out, again, that there is a difference between such material being in school libraries, such material being in public libraries and such material being generally available (whether for purchase or otherwise circulated), and confined this example to school libraries.
I find it curious that twice now you have attempted to move the goal posts to find a gotcha moment as if that somehow undermines my point, when the fact you need to look for one actually supports what I was saying.
But this all goes to show why talking about censorship and suchlike is a very complex matter, and even to bring it back on topic, why Musk bought Twitter. It was never about making money out of it because what he got was something far more valuable than mere money. He got sycophants and acolytes. A veritable online army to preach Elonism.