California Case Update

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage"

Also known as competing in the free market. Are these guys serious? Why is this judge not focussing on evidence for anything, and if no evidence is given then why even continue and waste more time and money? I guess you have to be a lawyer to understand that.

It's beggars belief how such a claim can be entered and not be immediately thrown out by the judge
But then I remember, we live in a civilized, first world country and such things are allowed. :confused:
 
So they agree that XF buyers won't buy vBulletin - because it's an inferior product :D.

Thank you for the explanation. If that's what it means, XF's chances of winning are better in my opinion.
Yeah...I guess they are working on the notion that KAM are brainwashing us into buying xf. It's not like people do their research before investing into a software to run their site for years to come :rolleyes:
 
Yeah...I guess they are working on the notion that KAM are brainwashing us into buying xf. It's not like people do their research before investing into a software to run their site for years to come :rolleyes:

I actually found out that KAM was not three people but one! And to prove it I found a picture.

1232904062_hypno toad.gif
 
Are these guys serious? Why is this judge not focussing on evidence for anything, and if no evidence is given then why even continue and waste more time and money?
This wouldn't even be making it into court in the UK with the current nonsense presented. It wouldn't get past the preliminary phase with IB's current "evidence."
 
Also... from PACER... (related to XF)

#127 (7/31/2012)
Docket Text said:
Docket Text: NOTICE of Change of address by Pamela D Deitchle attorney for Defendants Kier Darby, Xenforo Limited. Changing attorneys address to 790 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 797, Pasadena, CA 91101. Filed by Defendants Kier Darby, Xenforo Limited. (Deitchle, Pamela)

Not worth the download, just an address change for the attorney.
 
Somewhere, deep in the annals of this thread, I posted a link to the report on Judicial Business of the United States Courts. Here is an updated link: http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics.aspx
If you dig in there, you will find all sorts of stats on average time for each stage of proceeding.

I think such things are useless, though, in figuring out how this case will go. Each case is different and the conduct of the parties, the volume of evidence, the complexity of the arguments, the practice of the judge sitting on the case, and probably a hundred other factors play into how a specific case will progress. There is a wide spread in how long cases take. At best, I think you can use the stats as a way of seeing what happens on "average." But, I would not forget to consider the outliers in terms of fast and slow cases.

All that said, getting to trial is a major hurdle and it indicates that things are moving along. How long the case continues once trial starts will depend, again on many factors. Trials can last weeks, months, or longer. And even after the close of evidence or even a verdict, you can have some continued motions proceedings. Still, I would not think that you would see a trial measured in months (and I would be surprised if more than two weeks- especially as it seems that IB does not have any experts or evidence that helps their case...so, I can't for the life of me imagine what they are going to present), and if, as all the evidence and filings that I have seen indicate, XF wins, then you will likely see an "end" to the case by Spring/Summer of 2013 (though, you can end up having additional motions on things such as award of costs and fees that can drag on).
 
Since most people here don't like OT posts in this thread, I went ahead and deleted all recent such posts.

http://i.imgur.com/frmVG.gif

...then you will likely see an "end" to the case by Spring/Summer of 2013 (though, you can end up having additional motions on things such as award of costs and fees that can drag on).

would there be a possibility of appeals, from either side, if the case doesn't swing their way? I'm not from the US so not sure how much further it could be taken after a verdict is given in the current court. I guess here you could appeal to the supreme courts depending on the circumstances etc.
 
http://i.imgur.com/frmVG.gif



would there be a possibility of appeals, from either side, if the case doesn't swing their way? I'm not from the US so not sure how much further it could be taken after a verdict is given in the current court. I guess here you could appeal to the supreme courts depending on the circumstances etc.

It is possible, but unlikely. The appeals would generally only address if the lower court made legal errors. Facts found at trial are generally not reviewed. So, you would have to see what was found in the lower court before even trying to see what legitimate appeals there might be. But, the general answer is that appeals are not likely.

Depending on the issue you could go to Supreme Court. HIGHLY unlikely, though. The Supreme Court does not have to agree to hear an appeal, and they normally only do so if it is a very important issue or if there is a "split" among different judicial circuits such that you have a lack of uniformity on federal law issues. Most likely, if there were an appeal, it would end at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. I might be wrong, but I highly doubt IB would appeal. I could see XF appealing on jurisdictional issues if they lose because that seems a viable argument and I think there are serious jurisdictional issues in this case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom