California Case Update
- Thread starter Shamil
- Start date
- Status
F
Floris
Guest
You mean negative.
The outcome should not be positive for the plaintiffs, in this case.
The outcome should not be positive for the plaintiffs, in this case.
F
Floris
Guest
I knooooooow.
Deepmartini
Well-known member
I hope IB is forced to pay all legal costs and Xenforo countersues for extra damages.
TheLaw
Well-known member
This is the quintessential example why I always wanted far more to be a judge than a lawyer. It's difficult to stomach watching how much time, effort and money is wasted on nothing more than correcting the fundamental misstated facts in plaintiff's claim... All of this bumbling is designed to create an endless, ludicrously expensive exercise to untangle the tangled web of sheer incompetence, fabrication and obvious obfuscation by the plaintiff. There are a good number of judges who likely would have figured this out and put an end to it long ago. Let's hope it's right about that time...
jauburn
Well-known member
Agree. This is ********. I hope vbulletin gets what it deserves.
Wired
Active member
Gotta make sure you don't hinder one's right to due process.
On the 19th of December, an order was made pertinent to the motion stated by Defendant(s).
PROCEEDINGS: Defendants' Motion to dismiss claims 2 - 12 of 2nd amended complaint; Motion to dismiss 2nd
amended complaint in its entirety for failure to join a party; Motion for a more definite
statement; Request for hearing
The parties submit on their papers as filed.
The Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART defendants’
motion, as stated on the record, for reasons as stated on the
record.
Plaintiff shall submit a proposed order.
I have not yet seen exactly what has been denied or granted.
PROCEEDINGS: Defendants' Motion to dismiss claims 2 - 12 of 2nd amended complaint; Motion to dismiss 2nd
amended complaint in its entirety for failure to join a party; Motion for a more definite
statement; Request for hearing
The parties submit on their papers as filed.
The Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART defendants’
motion, as stated on the record, for reasons as stated on the
record.
Plaintiff shall submit a proposed order.
I have not yet seen exactly what has been denied or granted.
Reeve of Shinra
Well-known member
anything granted in favor of the defendant (xenforo) is progress 
Gene Steinberg
Well-known member
But it would be nice to see where they won and where they didn't win.
grant sarver
Well-known member
The great thing is, it's all win. The "granted" is decided in XF favor and the "denied" is just deferred for later judgment.
Onimua
Well-known member
I thought "denied" meant they were decided on and the answer is "no"?
Gene Steinberg
Well-known member
Yes but what specifically was granted and what specifically got deferred?
Gene Steinberg
Well-known member
Your post was without context. Maybe someone with more information can provide perspective.
- Status