California Case Update

Status
Not open for further replies.
FreshFroot said:
Where did you find this info? please share.
Click to expand...
http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/showthread.php/329672-Sincere-thanks-to-the-vBulletin-community!
Dec 7, 2009

Sincere thanks to the vBulletin community!



Greetings all,​
​
As some of you know, my wife and I own property in Central America and have worked for the last few years toward building a home there. We are now in a position where we can begin construction, and that will require a lot of time on site and a great deal of travel.​
​
Since my role in vBulletin can't reasonably be filled from 3,000 miles away, the time has come for me to transition various responsibilities to my teammates. I will be with Team vB through this Friday, December 11.​
​
These changes will not directly affect vBulletin customers. The rest of the team remains intact, and the most important things are not changing:​
​
Kevin Sours will continue to run vBulletin's large Engineering group, with backup from Joe Rosenblum, Internet Brands's CTO.​
​
Don Kuramura will continue to be responsible for Product Management, strategy, and business development.​
​
Steve Machol will continue managing the Support team, with backup from Jennifer Rundell, Internet Brands's VP of Content.​
​
The path to building 4.0 out the door has been incredibly exciting, and all the more so to have done it alongside such a smart and dedicated team. (Each of them has a standing invitation to visit Lake Arenal!)​
​
vBulletin is in very capable hands. The imminent release of 4.0 is just the beginning of some very exciting things ahead. The Internet evolves quickly, so in addition to new things like the Content Publishing Suite, Team vB are working on even bigger expansions, like products and services for big-board customers, vB for mobile, and more.​
​
Again, a heartfelt thank you to the vBulletin community for all of your support.​
​
Onward!​
​
Click to expand...
Last Activity Wed 16th Dec '09 12:12am (boy, he never looked back)
 
@FreshFoot - Ray was a scapegoat. The sh!t people blamed him for is still happening, how do you not see this. Lift your petty hate off the guy and blame the company, that's what everyone else did.
 
Chris said:
With regard to the relevance of Floris' blog and this case....

I'm just guessing.....

...but I think what I.B. are trying to use it for, is mainly for the purpose of attempting to establish a time-line on XF. I doubt the comments themselves, other than the date they were made are very relevant to the case.

-Chris
Click to expand...

I feel that's the case indeed. I am not involved, nor is the site. It's just added by Joe as a 'I said I read that, and here is screenshot of where I read it'.
 
Mikey said:
@FreshFoot - Ray was a scapegoat. The sh!t people blamed him for is still happening, how do you not see this. Lift your petty hate off the guy and blame the company, that's what everyone else did.
Click to expand...

I do blame the company. But it started with this guy. I don't really care if he followed through with his wishes or the companies. At the end of the day the guy hasn't once shown me he felt bad or is sorry about what happened.

He acts like it was a good thing or that he could care less with what happened. So for me, I have no respect for the guy, when he shows none for me.

Like I said, I could CARE LESS about what you think.
 
steven s said:
What business is it of anyone's on what grounds Ray left?
Click to expand...

I make it my business. His actions involved the loss of my investments. So it is my business regardless if he's PART of NOT Part of the company's decision. He was there and it's simple as that..

if he at least went out and said "hey I'm sorry for what happened, if I could redo it myself I would change things".

He showed no remorse or any act of kindness. So as I stated. I don't really care what you or anyone else thinks.

I gave my opinion on the matter and anyone that WANTS to go through with giving him negative feedback can do so. If you don't want to, then don't simple as that....

Your wasting your time fighting with me.
 
<<< Thread will be updated will PACER files shortly >>>

All In One File (inc Docket rpt.) http://ge.tt/5V07IDw?c (Updated 19th Apr 2011/Doc 48)

29th Oct 2010
1 - Complaint - (Discovery)
2 - Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties
3 - Report on Filing of Copyright Action (Initial Notification)
4 - Statement

3rd Nov 2010
5 - Miscellaneous Document

4th Nov 2010
6 - Order

15th Nov 2010
7 - Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days)
8 - Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days)

16th Nov 2010
9 - Proof of Service (subsequent documents)
10 - Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112)

19th Nov 2010
11 - First Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)
11-1 - [Proposed Order]

29th Nov 2010
12 - Order

6th Dec 2010
13 - Request to Substitute Attorney (G-01)
14 - Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
14-1 - [Declaration]
14-2 - [Proposed Order]
15 - Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
15-1 - [Declaration]
15-2 - [Proposed Order]
16 - Motion to Dismiss Case
16-1 - [Declaration]
16-2 - [Proposed Order]

17 - Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties

9th Dec 2010
18 - Order on Request to Substitute Attorney

27th Dec 2010
19 - Amended Document (Non-Motion)
20 - Amended Document (Non-Motion)

28th Dec 2010
21 - Amended Complaint
22 - Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
22-1 - [Declaration]
23 - MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion
23-1 - [Declaration]
23-2 - [Declaration]
24 - MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion
24-1 - [Declaration]
24-2 - [Declaration]
25 - Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112)
26 - Miscellaneous Document
27 - Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held

4th Jan 2011
28 - Reply (Motion related)
29 - Reply (Motion related)
30 - Reply (Motion related)

==== NOT UPLOADED YET ====

31 - Declaration (Motion related)

7th Feb 2011
32 - Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction

15th Feb 2011
33 - Order

17th Feb 2011
34 - Motion to Dismiss (cause or other)

14th Mar 2011
35 - MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion

15th Mar 2011
36 - Transcript (CV)
37 - Notice of Filing Transcript (G-46)

21st Mar 2011
38 - Reply (Motion related)

4th Apr 2011
40 - Order on Motion to Dismiss

5th Apr 2011
39 - Notice of Lodging

6th Apr 2011
41 - Order

7th Apr 2011
42 - Motion for Preliminary Injunction
42-1 - [Declaration of Joseph Rosenblum Part 1]
42-2 - [Declaration of Joseph Rosenblum Part II]
42-3 - [Declaration of David N. Tarlow]
42-4 - [Declaration of Jennifer Rundell]
42-5 - [Declaration of Adrian Harris]
42-6 - [Declaration of Lynn Tokeshi]
42-7 - [Declaration of Bruce Abramson]
42-8 - [Proof of Service]
42-9 - [Proposed Order]

8th Apr 2011
43 - Declaration (Motion related)

11th Apr 2011
44 - Notice of Manual Filing (G-92)
45 - Exhibit to Motion

==== UPLOADED ====

46 - Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order - Rejecting
46-1 - [Exhibit In support of Plaintiff's Motion]

15th Apr 2011
47 - Ex Parte Application to Continue
47-1 - [Proposed Order]

18th Apr 2011
48 - Response in Opposition to Motion
48-1 - [Certificate of Service]

19th Apr 2011

49 - Stipulation to Continue
49-1 - [Proposed Order Continuing Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Setti]
50 - Notice of Withdrawal

20th Apr 2011
51 - Order
<<<Previous documents to follow shortly>>>

21st Apr 2011
52 - Answer to Complaint (Discovery)
 
Shamil, my friend, you're killing me with all this dropbox stuff. How about a site that isn't blocked by my proxy at work? :p
 
jmurrayhead said:
Shamil, my friend, you're killing me with all this dropbox stuff. How about a site that isn't blocked by my proxy at work? :p
Click to expand...

I cannot host it on my personal site: I could be potentially liable. I'll try to find some alternative sources, including attaching them to this thread.
 
synopsis ??

Xenforo has an excellent law firm that is making the case to get the California lawsuit dismissed due to a prior identical case that was filed in England first, he is also claiming that vB/IB did not have a right to unilaterally file an amended complaint without the court authorizing it first or ruling on XenForo motion to dismiss.

Mr. Grace is asking the court to dismiss the case in California because of the excessive burden of dual lawsuits, highlighting the fact that the court in England is the proper and only jurisdiction due to the fact that the 'alleged crimes' took place in England.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom