Sir nick Well-known member Oct 1, 2010 #1 Enter no text in input and press post. When you go to type the real text you get the following
J JamesM Member Oct 1, 2010 #2 I don't think that's an error, correct me if i'm wrong but your trying to send a message without content? Also the wait 20 seconds feature will be to stop spam i would guess.
I don't think that's an error, correct me if i'm wrong but your trying to send a message without content? Also the wait 20 seconds feature will be to stop spam i would guess.
F Floris Guest Oct 1, 2010 #3 Working as designed, it's not a bug. You submitted something - so the flood setting is accurate, and since you didn't enter something valid, the error msg is valid as well.
Working as designed, it's not a bug. You submitted something - so the flood setting is accurate, and since you didn't enter something valid, the error msg is valid as well.
P Paul B XenForo moderator Staff member Oct 2, 2010 #4 As James and Floris have already said, this is expected behaviour. Moving to http://xenforo.com/community/forums/resolved-bug-reports.13/
As James and Floris have already said, this is expected behaviour. Moving to http://xenforo.com/community/forums/resolved-bug-reports.13/
Sir nick Well-known member Oct 2, 2010 #5 Floris said: Working as designed, it's not a bug. You submitted something - so the flood setting is accurate, and since you didn't enter something valid, the error msg is valid as well. Click to expand... I thought it wouldn't be considered a flood, but ok.
Floris said: Working as designed, it's not a bug. You submitted something - so the flood setting is accurate, and since you didn't enter something valid, the error msg is valid as well. Click to expand... I thought it wouldn't be considered a flood, but ok.
P Paul B XenForo moderator Staff member Oct 2, 2010 #6 OK, this has been moved back to bug reports as Mike has confirmed the flood control shouldn't actually kick in as the post was unsuccessful.
OK, this has been moved back to bug reports as Mike has confirmed the flood control shouldn't actually kick in as the post was unsuccessful.
Sir nick Well-known member Oct 2, 2010 #7 Brogan said: OK, this has been moved back to bug reports as Mike has confirmed the flood control shouldn't actually kick in as the post was unsuccessful. Click to expand... woot was right
Brogan said: OK, this has been moved back to bug reports as Mike has confirmed the flood control shouldn't actually kick in as the post was unsuccessful. Click to expand... woot was right
F Floris Guest Oct 2, 2010 #8 Sir nick said: woot was right Click to expand... Didn't say you were wrong. I said it is working as designed The reason I mentioned flood is because that's its functionality.
Sir nick said: woot was right Click to expand... Didn't say you were wrong. I said it is working as designed The reason I mentioned flood is because that's its functionality.
Sir nick Well-known member Oct 2, 2010 #9 Floris said: Didn't say you were wrong. I said it is working as designed The reason I mentioned flood is because that's its functionality. Click to expand... Yea but it shouldn't be considered a flood because you didn't post a message, If i did then it would be IMO.
Floris said: Didn't say you were wrong. I said it is working as designed The reason I mentioned flood is because that's its functionality. Click to expand... Yea but it shouldn't be considered a flood because you didn't post a message, If i did then it would be IMO.