Adam Howard
Well-known member
Apache -vs- nginx -vs- lighttpd?
So which do you prefer and why?
So which do you prefer and why?
Apache -vs- nginx -vs- lighttpd?
- Thread starter Adam Howard
- Start date
DregondRahl
Member
nginx
Easier config, atleast for me.
Easier config, atleast for me.
Luke F
Well-known member
nginx - simpler configuration than any other web server, while also being arguably the fastest and lightest.
I've got it constantly handling 200 or so simultaneous connections (mostly static images and keep-alive) with ~5MB memory usage and ~0.0002% cpu time over the past 45 days (assuming I did the maths right).
Plus some of the stuff you can do in its config files is incredible, like if statements, variables, and even embedded perl.
I've got it constantly handling 200 or so simultaneous connections (mostly static images and keep-alive) with ~5MB memory usage and ~0.0002% cpu time over the past 45 days (assuming I did the maths right).
Plus some of the stuff you can do in its config files is incredible, like if statements, variables, and even embedded perl.
DregondRahl
Member
Speaking of fast, your gaming forum has blazing speed compared to the other XenForo forums I have seen, its almost double this forum speed. Whats the secret ?
Luke F
Well-known member
Could be any of: Nginx (with a 2500+ line config >.>), PHP-FPM, APC (with XenForo set to use it for internal caches), decently configured MySQL (around 0.004s spent on queries in XF on most pages), decent hardware (quad core server, though probably cancelled out by the amount of other stuff running
), Linux (<3 Fedora), decent network/isp.Over the 2 or so years I've been fiddling with this server, the most noticeable improvements in forum performance (phpBB 3, vB 3.8, vB 4.0 and XF) have come from the switch to Nginx from Apache (anyone using Apache or similar servers such as Litespeed or Zend should seriously consider switching), and then from standalone FastCGI processes (used to run Windows; was still faster than proxying to Apache) to PHP-FPM. And of course the switch from Windows to Fedora, but I doubt that's a concern for many
DregondRahl
Member
Could be any of: Nginx (with a 2500+ line config >.>), PHP-FPM, APC (with XenForo set to use it for internal caches), decently configured MySQL (around 0.004s spent on queries in XF on most pages), decent hardware (quad core server, though probably cancelled out by the amount of other stuff running
Over the 2 or so years I've been fiddling with this server, the most noticeable improvements in forum performance (phpBB 3, vB 3.8, vB 4.0 and XF) have come from the switch to Nginx from Apache (anyone using Apache or similar servers such as Litespeed or Zend should seriously consider switching), and then from standalone FastCGI processes (used to run Windows; was still faster than proxying to Apache) to PHP-FPM. And of course the switch from Windows to Fedora, but I doubt that's a concern for many
2500+ line config o.o sounds like a recipe book XD
Most likely its the MySQL (0.004s are incredible for those JOINS) and Nginx config then. Whats the memory usage for loading the mainpage? Fedora and Debian <3 for me. The only reason I used Lighty was because php5.2 was required for a project and it was easier to let Lighty handle the fcgi part. I really have to benchmark XenForo on Nginx later. Any -hint- for getting Nginx config running a little smoother?
Luke F
Well-known member
Code:
Page Time: 0.0431s
Memory: 2.5909 MB (Peak: 3.1432 MB)
Queries (12, time: 0.0042s, 9.8%)Why not just use the PHP-FPM patch on PHP 5.2?
Use a nice long keepalive time (I use 5 minutes, probably a bit too far for large forums
), stick to 1 worker process (might be just me, but performance seems to deteriorate otherwise), use epoll, sendfile, etc.
DregondRahl
Member
Wow, certainly a well tuned MySQL! Memory might have improvement with xCache rather than APC however o.o
I had trouble compiling the patch right with the latest version at the time, so I went with Lighty to save time so I can work on getting the site 5.3 compatible. However I find Lighty's rewrite rules a pain in the ...
Use a nice long keepalive time (I use 5 minutes, probably a bit too far for large forums
5mins or 5seconds o.o? 5mins is aloong keepalive (though Nginx should be able to handle it still) Also what about tcp_nopush, tcp_nodelay both 'on'?
Thanks for the tips !
Luke F
Well-known member
Yeah I have those both on, also you should ideally have access_log off for static content.
DregondRahl
Member
Code:
location /forum/ {
try_files $uri $uri/ /forum/index.php?$uri&$args;
access_log off;
expires max;
}I'm doing that, its very effective especially if not much changes. Only wish Nginx could merge files (multiple CSS and JS) like Lighty does with LUA, though your PHP version works pretty good too.
Blandt
Well-known member
Anyone tried Cherokee ?
decent little guy with a GUI admin for people with a gazillion sites .. click click and the siteS are live
http://www.cherokee-project.com/
I will post the config files for xenforo tomorrow, it's actually super simple via the admin panel few clicks and full SEO is on
decent little guy with a GUI admin for people with a gazillion sites .. click click and the siteS are live
http://www.cherokee-project.com/I will post the config files for xenforo tomorrow, it's actually super simple via the admin panel few clicks and full SEO is on
SneakyDave
Well-known member
I tried Cherokee, the fact that the administration is all the GUI confused me! I needed a command line to feel better about myself. Is it still being actively supported? I haven't visited it in a few months.
Blandt
Well-known member
hahahaha ... same here
but you know ... the new version (came out last week) is just out of this world ... they added a store thing, you pick your application ... and .. install ... done.! Everything is configured a la Windows !!
I love it ... it's just that no big sites are using it yet (unlike nginx proven reliability) ... but I will give these guys couple of years, and I'll bet they will rival nginx, especially the GUI thing, and the click-install are so easy .. will bring regular Joes in masses .. I mean you don't even need cPanel
Anyone tried Cherokee ?
decent little guy with a GUI admin for people with a gazillion sites .. click click and the siteS are live
I will post the config files for xenforo tomorrow, it's actually super simple via the admin panel few clicks and full SEO is on
I was considering using cherokee on my new server, the results seem amazing. If you could post your config would be great.
Blandt
Well-known member
Very simple 2 rules :
click on your vServers tab, then your domain (vserver) >>> select behavior tab >>> click Rule Management >>> click the plus sign to ad a rule >>> select Redirection >>> Click Add new Regex
Select Internal redirection
On the Regular Expression text box enter : /?(.*)
on the Substitution Text box enter : /index.php?/$1 (assuming xenforo is located at the root, if it's in a subfolder like community then >>> /community/index.php?/$1 )
Next
click + to add another rule select directory and enter : (data|js|styles|install)
on the handler screen select : HTTP Error
and on the HTTP Error drop down menu select : 403 forbidden
Hit save, >> Graceful Restart
I will take screen shots / or record a video when I get the chance
SilverCircle
Well-known member
Cherokee looks indeed like a very viable alternative. Nice feature set, good performance, easy configuration - it's all there. What it needs is to prove its reliability and robustness in a production environment. The last version I tested (though quite a while ago, so lots of things might have changed) had some issues with (simulated) high load scenarios.
Similar threads
