lul...while the US may have a massive debt that would destroy the economy completely instead of having a struggling economy. I like how you can see all the anti-US people on here come out in this thread...really funny.Seems to me, the simplest solution to a non financial type like myself, is to wipe all existing debts in all countries, then start again from scratch.
Or is that to simple? hehe
lul...while the US may have a massive debt that would destroy the economy completely instead of having a struggling economy. I like how you can see all the anti-US people on here come out in this thread...really funny.
Kinda the way my brothers kids grow instantly. I thing EQnoble has it figured out.Things happen dynamically.
There won't be a slow demise.
Change happens instantly.
No not at all. I was directing that to others in this thread who have expressed anti-US attitudes.Not sure if that last part was targetted at me? But I'm not anti US in the slighest.
Me neither, but it's a common fallacy, i.e. assuming one is anti-US because one talks about what is wrong with it. That's like a person recognizing the symptoms of a disease and therefore must hate the diseased person. In that case I hate Europe as much as the US. In reality of course I hate neither.Not sure if that last part was targetted at me? But I'm not anti US in the slighest.
You'd have to call the Mormon Church "charity" in order to believe those numbers......personally, I leave Scientology, the Rev. Moon and other such "charities" out of my calcs.So Romney paid 3 million in taxes and gave 3 million to charity. Not bad.
Yeah when people involved in politics donate money to a religion I see it as buying votes with a write-off.You'd have to call the Mormon Church "charity" in order to believe those numbers......personally, I leave Scientology, the Rev. Moon and other such "charities" out of my calcs.
Turns out his rate is 13.9% - well less than I (a working stiff) pays. It takes double that rate to run the country.
that book John mentioned said:Q:When did you realize that so many insider trading and sweetheart land deals were going on?
A: When I first discovered that members of Congress are exempt from insider trading laws, I didn’t believe it. Then, when I started to look at their stock trades and compare them with what they were doing in office, I was stunned.
Dude, this book is full of this stuff and it will make your head explode...it's all true and backed up by mounds of evidence - all in the public record for anyone to see.Is this actually true?
Rep. Shelley Capito (R-W.Va.) and her husband "dumped between $100,000 and $250,000 in Citigroup stock the day after the briefing," Schweizer writes, and "at least ten U.S. senators, including John Kerry, Sheldon Whitehouse, and **** Durbin, traded stock or mutual funds related to the financial industry the following day." Durbin, Schweizer says, "attended that September 16 briefing with Paulson and Bernanke. He sold off $73,715 in stock funds the next day. Following the next terrifying closed-door briefing, on September 18, he dumped another $42,000 in stock. By doing so, Durbin joined some colleagues in saving themselves from the sizable losses that less-connected investors would experience." Some members even made gains on their trades, at a time when ordinary Americans without insider knowledge were seeing their life savings evaporate.
Perhaps the most disturbing revelations come from Schweizer's investigation into the Obama Energy Department and its infamous "green energy" loan guarantee and grant programs, a program Schweizer calls "the greatest -- and most expensive -- example of crony capitalism in American history." The scandal surrounding Solyndra -- the now-bankrupt, Obama-connected solar power company that received a federally guaranteed loan of $573 million -- is well known. But Solyndra, Schweizer says, is only the tip of the iceberg.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.