That PDF is probably old. The URL does not change a thing. It is for users. It used to and now it doesn't.
It's from 2010, not exactly old.
That PDF is probably old. The URL does not change a thing. It is for users. It used to and now it doesn't.
Ok. you go ahead and put all your SEO time into the URL structure then.
No. It is one small component to help users read where a link leads.
I'll let Kier do the arguing for me.
http://xenforo.com/community/threads/about-seo.2168/page-2#post-3293
What the hell are you talking about then? If the URL goes to its location then that is all it has to do, nothing else from that URL will help with SEO.I think Kier was talking about the formatting of URLs, not URLs themselves.
Um. No. It doesn't work that way, google needs to READ your on-page links before deciding that "Okay, this is a standard link structure for this site. Let's index." Your link structure has nothing to do with how google reads your site, your on-page information LEADS google to read your entire site's URL/link structure.What the hell are you talking about then? If the URL goes to its location then that is all it has to do, nothing else from that URL will help with SEO.
I think you're downplaying URL structure. And I pretty much disagree with it. I have "friendly" URL structure on both MW3Blog, and CODForums, and I was able to capture the other keywords than just mw3 blog, and cod forums respectively.Ok. you go ahead and put all your SEO time into the URL structure then.
Ummm... I know it doesn't, it is what I have been saying the whole time. URL structure just has to go to the page you need it to go to, it needs to render something. Other than that it does nothing for SEO, if you have a title in the link or not.Um. No. It doesn't work that way, google needs to READ your on-page links before deciding that "Okay, this is a standard link structure for this site. Let's index." Your link structure has nothing to do with how google reads your site, your on-page information LEADS google to read your entire site's URL/link structure.
Let me put it this way, there is no tag cloud on MW3Blog, yet the tags are indexed regardless. But how has it been indexed? Well, your posts leads google there.
Indeed. I agree.Matt Cutts said that it helps "a little bit" and it would be worth considering "for a new site".
I think that you don't like learning from others. It feels like you're forcing ideas onto people.Sigh this is pointless.
Buddy can give me any link about it ? Like I posted Google's Documentation...No. What I am saying is true. The structure of a URL will not have an impact on your search page ranking. It is simply used by the crawler to go to the location it points to, if it is allowed to. It gets its data from the HTML, like the title tag, description tag, h1, h2, h3, micro data or whatever it is called, HTML5 data attributes. If a search engine sees this URL as http://xenforo.com/community/threads/xenforo-seo.24395/page-2 it will rank EXACTLY the same if it was http://xenforo.com/community/t/24395/2.
Sure, Mr. SEO expert.You don't realize you're talking to a person who does this for a living.
Is that was for me, no I am not kidding. I am n00b in SEO & learning new things. I stumbled upon Google's Beginner PDF, so asked my doubt.You're kidding me right? Why would a search engine use the URL structure for content when it has SO much HTML data to get it from? And when it could EASILY be abused. You can put literally anything in your URL.
Go ahead and ask.
Err I think "SEO experts" is a joke and most the time you pay for some company who knows barely anything and will just fill out your meta data. What I meant is I work on websites for a living, develop them from the ground up...Sure, Mr. SEO expert.
I almost tried calling myself the SEO expert, but after reading about so called "SEO experts" I don't need it. *laughs and snickers*
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.