As would ftp:// then I guess...tbh i never paid any attention with or without www. although i still think we need to get rid of http:// from the internet, seems a pointless protocol
hahatbh i never paid any attention with or without www. although i still think we need to get rid of http :// from the internet, seems a pointless protocol
At first I thought your reply #21 was a tolling post but you are being serious?is that so captain obvious.
Try to actually understand this topic correlate with my post next time you make an assumption ok?
This topic was about using www or without www which is used on server to internet browser, So i suggested removing http as you browse the site
either on server level or on browser http where it should be removed(hidden) which serves no purpose afterall.
http on browsers only serve as cosmetic purpose
okay, I mis-read thanI think what maidos is saying that the http:// isn't necessary to be used in a URL or a browser because it would be implied. Meaning I shouldn't have to type http://xenforo.com but just xenforo.com because it's obvious that I want this to be http. He's not talking about removing the protocol itself, simply the mentioning of the protocol when going to a web address.
My football team's website needs it or it won't load, which is annoying.I think www went out with the 90's. I know some or a lot of people still use it. None of my sites have the prefix.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.