Wordpress Drama

Ha! The good old karma bus has hit him!
Laughing Out Loud Lol GIF by Minions
 

On September 30, a day before the WordPress.org deadline for the ban on WP Engine, the hosting company updated its site’s footer to clarify it is not directly affiliated with the WordPress Foundation or owns the WordPress trade.

“WP Engine is a proud member and supporter of the community of WordPress® users. The WordPress® trademark is the intellectual property of the WordPress Foundation, and the Woo® and WooCommerce® trademarks are the intellectual property of WooCommerce, Inc. Uses of the WordPress®, Woo®, and WooCommerce® names in this website are for identification purposes only and do not imply an endorsement by WordPress Foundation or WooCommerce, Inc. WP Engine is not endorsed or owned by, or affiliated with, the WordPress Foundation or WooCommerce, Inc,” the updated description on the site read.

The company also changed its plan names from “Essential WordPress,” “Core WordPress,” and “Enterprise WordPress” to “Essential,” “Core,” and “Enterprise.”
 
There's this video:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

...A lot of his reasons and arguments are fairly disingenuous.
  • Him saying that he could be removed from stewardship if the other board members wanted him removed... Even though said board members are uninvolved, and were placed there by him and have personal ties to him.
  • His personal ownership of Wordpress.org, rather than it being owned by the foundation, when it is basically a mandatory requirement to take advantage of almost all services for Wordpess.
    • The lack of transparency on being able to remove all access to Wordpress, without clear reasons.
  • His initial actions were definitely not about trademark infringement, but specifically about contribution and money. Walking it back and now making it about trademark infringement when he could have clearly just updated the terms to use the phrase Wordrpess. Again, these have not been pushed on any other service provider and only on WP Engine so far.
🤦‍♂️ The structure of Wordpress Foundation opens up a lot of questions on his almost sole ownership and management of Wordpress, especially when he seemingly makes very emotional decisions that could have serious legal repercussions.
 
Anyone else paying attention to the current Wordpress (Matt Mullenweg) and his vendetta against WP Engine?

Here's an article about it: https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/26/wordpress-vs-wp-engine-drama-explained/

It's to the point that Wordpress.org is actively blocking customers who use WP Engine from using the main repo for plugin and themes.

Wordpress is nice, but it's bloated as anything as everyone knows.

Matt should be more worried about making a faster system and getting rid of that Gutenberg garbage.
 
I'm also glad I never referred anyone to the overpriced nonsense known as WPEngine. Literally no reason for anyone to ever use them.

And now this....
 
When they don't own a trademark on "WP" they really don't make a strong point at all.
When you develop a system, do you have to have a trademark? I think developing and producing it means having the rights! For example, whose blog is Taylor? Taylor's because it was developed by Taylor..
 
Seems WPEngine has their mirror system in place now. Not sure how it would work long term as I imagine it's still dependent on wordpress.org initial access.

This drama just highlights and puts on notice every for-profit WordPress user. Makes discussions like this one important https://www.reddit.com/r/Wordpress/s/ZEtWFCZveD

My proof of concept for Cloudflare Worker/R2 S3 bucket and Cloudflare CDN cached WordPress plugin mirror system I whipped up https://gist.github.com/centminmod/952394157905596f4ef7656b3132f391 :cool:
 
When you develop a system, do you have to have a trademark? I think developing and producing it means having the rights! For example, whose blog is Taylor? Taylor's because it was developed by Taylor..
No you don't have to have a trademark. Creating something will give you the copyright on that though, but for your example of my addon, anyone can take it, modify it, and re-release it with their own name on it as that's how the MIT license works.
 
Can you make a R2 addon for Wordpress? I'll be the first buyer.
I think @digitalpoint already made one? But it's the paid version of his WP plugin.

 
Matt’s something…

 
Matt’s something…

Yeah heard of Matt's actions. Between that and leaked SMS text messages of Matt's to WPEngine!
 
There’s already so much drama in the world, who has time for something as stupid as “Wordpress drama”?…
These numbers could be inflated or deflated, as I haven't fully verified the statistics myself:

WordPress powers 43.5% of all websites as their CMS. Around 478 million websites are built on WordPress. WordPress dominates the CMS market with a 62.6% share.

The initial issue stemmed from lack of contributions (or not enough) by WP Engine to the Wordpress Foundation (though they contribute through code, and not money), and then was changed to an issue of trademark with Automaticc (for the Wordpress Foundation). The retaliation of removing the use of Wordpress.org (which is built as a foundation of most backend Wordpress such as resources, and updates) was purely an emotional and personal action by Matt when WP Engine sent a C&D.

The only reason why this is important is that it has brought to light a lot of issues with the way that Wordpress is managed, and whether or not Matt is a proper steward for the foundation. The amount of control he has as an individual, the amount of control his for-profit company has, and how the Wordpress Foundation management has no check and balance for his behavior is worrisome.

Matt’s something…


The Thesis developer even admits that they were in the wrong regarding the GPL stuff, however Matt still has been a child up until about 2 years ago afaik. There are a few other examples of petty vindicitive behavior by Matt, though not $100,000 domain purchase petty.
 
What's that argument always posted here about one man band developers?
honest question?
does that not apply to any outside program developer?
is xenforo protected from that?
have there not been some here that took back their cookies back and left?
i know that one site is still waiting on updates to an add on and they are a major coder to improve the xenforo program.
can that not be an issue with any program that is dependent upon outside improvements?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom