What's score of Your site on Google Speed Test???

[Renegade]

87

High priority. These suggestions represent the largest potential performance wins for the least development effort. You should address this item first:
Enable compression

Compressing http://domain/community/js/xenforo/xenforo.js?_v=bba17b4a... could save 87.3KiB (68% reduction).

Any tips for this?

 

[oldzy]

Really ?

Yes. Was because of a 403 forbidden err though

 

[lazer]

90 here.

S'ok.

 

[rdn]

87 %

 

[pjfry]

85 I should combine some graphics in CSS-Sprites its the only hight priority everthing else is low or already done

http://onlinegilde.net

Benny

 

[dutchbb]

80 (vb3.x)

 

[Gene Steinberg]

From 77 to 88 depending on site. Main suggestion was to leverage browser caching, except an SEO person said disable browser caching, I think: <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache"/>
So suggestions are welcomed. Turn it off? Does it hurt SEO?

 

[DBA]

From 77 to 88 depending on site. Main suggestion was to leverage browser caching, except an SEO person said disable browser caching, I think: <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache"/>
So suggestions are welcomed. Turn it off? Does it hurt SEO?

Why would you not cache your static content?

 

[digitalpoint]

Except an SEO person said disable browser caching

They should probably start looking for a new line of work.

 

[Gene Steinberg]

How does one draw the distinction when most of what we have is PHP/MySQL, which as the forums and the WordPress sites?

 

[Andy.N]

93

 

[mikoo]

94

http://www.biologie-lexikon.de/forum/

 

[Jason]

From 77 to 88 depending on site. Main suggestion was to leverage browser caching, except an SEO person said disable browser caching, I think: <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache"/>
So suggestions are welcomed. Turn it off? Does it hurt SEO?

Caching is a necessary evil, not just for the web but modern computing in general.

Even though your "SEO person" is wrong, I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume they meant the cached version of your site as it appears on search engine results pages. It has zero bearing on how your site is indexed, and is actually useful (it shows you how the crawler sees the page). If you don't want Google, for example, to allow people to view a cached version of your site, use <meta name="robots" content="noarchive">

 

[onionaut]

85, was 50 when in VB

 

[karll]

90 after converting the forum icons into CSS sprites. I'll see if I can improve it even more if I get the time for it.

 

[Anthony Parsons]

95 here...

Compression and caching, CSS3 gradients only, minified and utilise Google for jquery source. Pretty easy to achieve with XF IMHO.

 

[Anthony Parsons]

A little testing on a default install, XF is fairly ordinary out of the box for this test, showing only a 77 out of 100.

I got it up to 82 by using its built-in performance features.

Adding compression, 88 out of 100.

Compression + caching, 91 out of 100.

The rest of the issue there forward is styling pretty much, being to get rid of gradients either into a sprite, or just altogether and use CSS3 and ditch supporting IE8 and older browsers for pretty gradients.

At 91 out of 100, it is ready for take-off in actual loading speed at default.

Added: Pushed it to 93 / 100 as I forgot the caching in config to utilise APC. Now fully cached and compressed... default XF install.

http://xftesting.com

 

[pjfry]

After doing some changes to my style and servr configuration I am now at a score of 93

Benny

 

[Teapot]

Getting 95 on my test site I hope AdSense doesn't knock it down too much.

 

[denisx04]

93 out of 100, excellent.