I was wondering if any of you would be inclined to share the user engagement levels across your social network profiles for your site(s). I know it varies depending on type of content, audience, niche, and how users discovered your profiles on the network but perhaps we could extrapolate rough ideas? Site Niche: Gaming Facebook (~2yrs) Likes: ~2,300 Engagement: 10 Likes per posting 3 shares per posting 1 commet per posting Site Social Traffic: 27.22% Google+ (~8months) Circles: ~80,000 Engagement: 39 comments per posting 10 reshares per posting 75 +1's per posting Site Social Traffic: 29.94% Twitter (~2.5yrs) Followers: ~10,000 Engagement: 2 retweets, 4 favorites per tweet on average Site Social Traffic: 21.5% Pinterest (~1yr) Followers: ~450 followers Engagement: 1 repin per pin on average Site Social Traffic: 8.31% Analysis:- I think G+ is underrated and could become more important depending on how Google chooses to use it G+ posts in search rankings. - Pinterest is a pretty crappy network for gaming. - A bulk of all social network followings are junk. Perhaps they got bored of the game my site focusses on (Minecraft). - I either suck at Facebook or it's overrated. - Twitter engagement per tweet (I do roughly 5 per day) is really low..? - Overall, I think it's important to be on multiple networks as it seems there are different types of individuals who use each one. (Demographics, age, and interaction habits). * I chose not to include Youtube as I have not posted anything on there in over a year and so traffic to my site is minuscule. Interested to see what type of social stats you all experience.