I had a hunch that the "social sharing" icons are rarely, if ever, used, so I went looking for some research on this issue and found this.
I'm tempted to disable the social sharing icons, since they seem just to take up space and are almost never used. How about you? Do you find that they're used? Do you have any way of tracking their use?
Hey, before tech stocks crashed in 2000, billions of $$$ were betting that they wouldn't. Before the U.S. decided to bomb the hell out of Iraq, billions of idiots believed the U.S. government when it said there were weapons of mass destruction there, waiting to kill us all.
So sure, I'm willing to argue against the herd any day of the week. That's why I asked.
If you are just using the default XF social icons at the bottom of the page, then yes, they are near useless. That doesn't mean social icons in general are useless. It's all about proper implementation. XF gets this majorly wrong.
maybe. i am active on twitter and google+. i use a plugin that lets me share from context menu on page and links. works great. i do not like to use social buttons on websites because they add their own content to the shared excerpt and i do not like that. plus they try to get interactive by providing the follow button. Twitter in some cases automatically follows the account if I use a share button on some websites.
I assume a lot of heavy users of social media have some system in place for quick sharing on their choice of networks!
Of course as one user mentioned... Firefox has internal feature. Google was experimenting with same but killed that component a while ago.
Interesting. Looked up the stats on GA, found we had <15 social share actions in the past 30 days. I hate how slow they are to load, so just disabled the stock XF social sharing buttons. Will look into add-ons.