XF 2.2 question about altering a table

[InfernoDev]

I'm running into an issue when I alter a table and add a new column, the new column doesn't exist and I get other errors like unknown getter, and some says the field is unknown, I know how to do the custom entities but is it a different approach for an existing table that you're altering..

This is my entity class

<?php

namespace rblapps\rbL1\Entity;

use XF\Mvc\Entity\Entity;
use XF\Mvc\Entity\Structure;

class PollResponse extends \XF\Entity\PollResponse
{
    public static function getStructure(Structure $structure)
    {

        $structure = parent::getStructure($structure);

        $structure->table = 'xf_poll_response';
        $structure->columns = [
            'user_id' => ['type' => self::UINT],
        ];

        return $structure;
    }
 
}

 

[Jeremy P]

You'll have to use the class extension system:

General concepts | Developer Documentation | XenForo

Developer documentation for XenForo

xenforo.com

 

[InfernoDev]

you know there seems to be an issue with the way I was doing the columns.

this is where the error came from, it seems to be having a problem with how I defined them like an array.

 $structure->columns = [
            'user_id' => ['type' => self::UINT],
        ];

but if I do it like this, everything works as expected.

        $structure->columns['feedback_score'] = ['type' => Entity::UINT, 'default' => 0];

above is how they do it on the lets build an addon page, but they have the columns as arrays if you look in the XF folder.

 

[Jeremy P]

Good catch, since you're extending the structure you don't want to overwrite the column property completely.

 

[InfernoDev]

Good catch, since you're extending the structure you don't want to overwrite the column property completely.

yea i was having an issue where if its a user table, it was basically overwriting the entire column like you said and I get errors saying a lot of stuff is missing, seems to be working now. I can even call the added user column on the xf:visitor which is nice.