Implemented Personal Conversations - rename Recipients to Participants

[Paul B]

On the main overview page, the "Conversation Starter" field is blank.
Instead under "Conversation Title" there is the title and author.

Also, under "Replies", it has e.g. Recipients 2.
Wouldn't that be better being renamed "Participants" ?

In the example quoted above, there was only 1 recipient as it was a conversation between me and 1 other member.

 

[XFA]

I second that.

This would be consistent with the fact that when you are in a conversation, you see a link "Add participants" and not "Add recipients".

 

[Chris M]

I third that.

 

[Kier]

I fourth... oh wait I'm already doing it.

 

[Paul B]

I fourth... oh wait I'm already doing it.

 

[Peggy]

Thread moved to Suggestions forum.

 

[Paul B]

Woohoo!

One of mine made it

 

[XFA]

By thinking at it I am wondering then why it's called inbox in the top header bar ?

 

[Kier]

Because it's a shorter, more immediate word than Conversations?

 

[Paul B]

Not sure if this is the best thread for this but the "Conversation Starter" field is still blank.
Is that intentional?

 

[XFA]

Because it's a shorter, more immediate word than Conversations?

Yes true thing

Not sure if this is the best thread for this but the "Conversation Starter" field is still blank.
Is that intentional?

I'd personnaly said no, report it in the bug section.

 

[Disjunto]

Not sure if this is the best thread for this but the "Conversation Starter" field is still blank.
Is that intentional?
<img snip>

it's not a column, it's a sort field. started and date are listed below title. same design is used in other parts of the forum aswell

 

[Derek Ivey]

Yeah that's intentional.