Duplicate New Discussion forum structured data issues detected

Anatoliy

Well-known member
Affected version
2.3.0
Yesterday I upgraded to 2.3.0 and today I got a notification from Google Search Console:

Search Console has identified that your site is affected by 1 Discussion forum structured data issue(s). The following issues were found on your site.

Top critical issues*​

Either "text", "image", or "video" should be specified

*Critical issues prevent your page or feature from appearing in Search results.

We recommend that you fix these issues when possible to enable the best experience and coverage in Google Search.

Is it a known bug in 2.3.0 or I messed something up?
GSC shows 3 affected items:

Please advice.
 
Is it a known bug in 2.3.0 or I messed something up?
It's to do with posts that have a video and no text. It is known about:


 
I follow everyone's explanations, especially from the XF team, but it's quite incomprehensible that we can't get rid of these warnings from the GSC. Is there no definitive and effective solution? Resource review fields are also systematically flagged, why? No definitive solution there too? I'm really perplexed by this...
 
It's to do with posts that have a video and no text. It is known about:
Thanks for your quick reply Mr Lucky!
It's not just for me, so that's good. )
But, all those 3 thread pages mentioned above don't have video, have text and images. So in my case it's about some other reason.
 
But, all those 3 thread pages mentioned above don't have video, have text and images. So in my case it's about some other reason.
No.


Those posts only have images and that's what Google complains about.

This needs to be either fixed by Google (which was announced, see quote below) or XenForo must add more complicated code to explicitly markup inline images / videos.
But even if XenForo does that the warnings probably won't fully go away due to posts that may only contain embedded content that is neither an image nor a video (like a SoundCloud embed).

The other issues (only image comments and deleted authors) don't show up as much in our web diffs, but we'll work on fixing them next round of updates. These are likely not leading to problems in our ingestion, it's just a reporting issue.

So realistically only Google can fully fix this.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom