Seems rather you are creating rumors out of nothing. For one
@Alpha1 referred to a 3rd party add on for documents and downloads (or rather the lack thereof) which does not exist due to the resource manager being an old, fat and ugly gorilla, sitting in this space. Secondly the new XF docs you refer to as "potential new documents add on" are obviously something completely different than that if you look at what Chris wrote how they work:
Although we still have a little way to go before our vision is fully complete, the first phase of our documentation overhaul is now live!
Previously our manual and developer documentation were stored in two separate sites, powered by MkDocs, and our REST API endpoint documentation was in a page node, right here on this forum!
Now all of the documentation is in one place,
docs.xenforo.com, and you can navigate between the Manual, Developers and API documentation from the top navigation.
It now includes improved search powered by
Algolia and features much...
And third,
@Alpha1 did not refer to documentation on a website (like the XF docs are) but rather on document management (which the Ressource manager offers in a very crude and painful way, but the new XF docs do not).
So you created the bizarre situation that you made up an obviously wrong claim for a future XF product in a thread about a completely different topic based on a comment of a co-forist that you shortened and this way made misunderstandable, that you obviously did not understand yourself and then created on the basis of this wrongdoing a claim for a non existing product that even if it existed would not fit to the problem
@Alpha1 named and you did this despite with just looking at the start posting of the thread for the new XF documentation it is obvious that it is neither an add on nor planned as such, obvious by how it is implemented, and it targets a completely different topic and problem than you claimed it would.
This is almost art. What it is clearly not: In any way helpful or useful. It is just creating FUD.
