I know he's using AI to make it, but it sounds like the problem is low-effort posting more than whether or not AI was used. It's important for people, whether it's in person or on a forum, to "read the room" and interact with others in a way that meets the norms of the place they're in, and obviously the AI summary stuff isn't doing that on your photography forum so it comes off as spammy. Maybe you could communicate general expectations like:
- Avoid bullet points and excessive formatting
- Use your own words to describe your photo
There's probably a lot of people out there using AI and some of it feels natural and other times it's super obvious slop and trying to draw the line somewhere to avoid to latter is tough for us admins. I am dealing with a similar situation myself where some of the AI-assisted content members are making is fantastic while other members are filling my queues with long-winded half-baked AI stuff that doesn't make sense for my forum and I'm like "did you even read this before you posted it?" There's got to be some sort of standards of quality. It's a forum for connecting members, not a personal dump site for mass-generated "content." Right?
