Adam Howard
Well-known member
We'll agree to disagree.That is good up until the point where you consistently use the same letter/number/symbol to replace the same letter. Anytime you add ANY point of consistency to a password you increase the likely hood it can be cracked. In that situation a longer password is actually worse because it gives them more points of comparison. Once I learn that 7h3 = the, I can deduce that 7h1$ = this and I'm off and running. Put this at the speed that a computer can think and it's cracked in no time. Letter substitutions are one of the worst passwords, and often the most recommended.
A password like e#J"_81jN is actually better than what you posted.
Everything can be decoded by computer in seconds or minutes.
WaFg%gH___--340==--)(()^&*()(#@~```~-_-_-*zo0$#hell0_=wo$d..@!^&do00o9be/\][+hackThIsBitch%^,.;b-i-t-c-h__
Took about 5 minutes for my pc to decode that.