Or... you can ban the members trying to do malicious things on your site because there's very few people that manually change a part of the url like that without bad intent.Well if it isn't a bug then at least there is inconsistency between XF and XFMG.
But I think that XFMG way of dealing with this is better. But in case you want to stick with the XF way then instead of "There are no messages on Mike's profile yet" (which isn't true) you should display something like "The page number you have requested doesn't exists".
We'll agree to disagree. To me this couldn't be less of an issue. These are urls that nobody should ever visit. Anyone doing that is just looking for bugs to exploit (not literally -anyone- but definitely the strong majority, the rest are trying to shortcut to a page they recall and that's super rare).but at least it's clear we need some consistency here.
But I think that XFMG way of dealing with this is better. But in case you want to stick with the XF way then instead of "There are no messages on Mike's profile yet" (which isn't true) you should display something like "The page number you have requested doesn't exists".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.