Avatars are avatars.What's the difference between avatars and icons for the purpose of featured threads? I thought the icons were the avatars.
Icons are uploaded images.
Avatars are avatars.What's the difference between avatars and icons for the purpose of featured threads? I thought the icons were the avatars.
Have a look at Style Properties: CTA Featured Threads Blocks.
If you want the page to look the same as the blocks, copy all of the settings from there.
So possible to:If using Nodes as Tabs, it's possible.
Icon
Thread Content (Avatar)
Thread Content (Icon)
Thread Text (Avatar)
Thread Text (Icon)
Copy the settings for all of those from CTA Featured Threads Blocks to CTA Featured Threads Page.
I have told you what you need to do if you want the page blocks to look the same as the blocks on the other pages.
Feel free to completely rewrite all of the HTML, CSS and templates.There ought to be an easier way, as suggested.
Feel free to completely rewrite all of the HTML, CSS and templates.
It has been developed like this to make it as flexible as possible.
Not so it's a one-click change.
Well, I'm just giving you honest feedback. I appreciate your efforts. But you probably should listen to your users, since their feedback comes at a cost, too--their time. Tech people aren't always good at listening--I worked at enough software houses to know. That's probably why there are business dev people and tech people, and the two sides work on different planets/offices.
This is consistent with how Xenforo behaves - clicking on an icon in Resources takes you to the Resource, not the author's profile.Another issue: on the featured threads page, when you click an avatar, you see the user profile. When you click an icon inserted by the thread featurer, however, you are taken to the thread. I would think that, to be consistent, you would also see the author's profile, regardless of whether the profile has an avatar.
Yes, Brogan should and does listen to the users of this add-on. So here's my opinion - it's great just the way it is. It's very flexible in how it can be styled to suit anyone's needs - all that is required is a modicum of intelligence and actually being bothered to read and digest the detailed information given at each update.
I made a simple statement, I wasn't insinuating you weren't intelligent but if you wish to take it that way then so be it.Look, buddy, your insulting my intelligence is noted--and not appreciated. I have plenty of it, maybe more than you do, since I don't even know who you are. I do know that my opinion counts as much as yours. Brogan can use us as two data points.
I did it and it works. There ought to be an easier way, as suggested.
Another issue: On the enable icon option of the cta featured threads main options page, there's this: If the width and height values are changed, the corresponding Style Property values (ctaFtIconPage) should also be changed to match, to avoid uploaded images being scaled.
Questions:
What is "ctaFtIconPage"?
Avatars are defined as 102px, while icons as 96px on Style Properties: CTA Featured Threads Blocks
Why two different sizes?
And should "enable icon option" of "cta featured threads main options page" be 102 or 96?
Glad to hear it. This addon is possibly one of the easiest to customise because of the amount of work you've put into the Style Properties. Anyone who takes that few minutes to read through the addon details in the main resource can easily customise it to their preferences. But, like everything out there, you have to read the instructions first.Hundreds of customers are happy with it the way it is so I won't be making any changes to the approach I have taken from the start.
I also like the fact that you take into account people's suggestions, even if they are not practical.
I like that, too. I just wish that new features were made into options so that those who upgrade in order to get just one particular feature out of several don't have to spend an hour or more fiddling with settings in order to get the plug-in to work the way it used to.
They are.I like that, too. I just wish that new features were made into options
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.