Cleaning-Up Spam

Discussion in 'Have You Seen...?' started by Kier, Aug 18, 2010.

  1. mjp Well-Known Member

    Anyone else seeing:

    Timeout
    The server did not respond in time. Please try again.

    When doing the IP check? No IP check, no timeout.
  2. Dean XenMod

    Probably best to have a separate thread so it gets better exposure, but if it were me I'd re-test after B3 came out. No I am not sure when that is exactly, but it could be next week.
  3. mjp Well-Known Member

    Roger that.
  4. Decent60 Well-Known Member

    I never experienced this, but I was only doing it to my own IP address and not a proxy type (banning test accounts on Beta 2). It might just be a server fluke.
  5. Jukizo New Member

    dis one is jes awesum!
  6. doobbe Member

    I can't using cleaning-Up spam

    Code:
    The following error occurred:
    The server did not respond in time. Please try again.
  7. Thalagyrt Member

    I can't use it either even with Check IPs unchecked. This is kinda problematic honestly as my mods can't do anything about spam.
  8. kforo Active Member

    I was just informed that if you have adblock installed, the captcha thing on signup never loads. I just confirmed. (I don't know if a message should be displayed above the text saying you need to disable google adblock to sign up or?)


    "ReCAPTCHA verification is loading. Please refresh the page if it does not load"
  9. Kier XenForo Developer

    It's rather ironic that the Google adblocker would block Google's own ReCAPTCHA system.
  10. kforo Active Member

    google adblocker is created to block ads and whanot on google's servers by 3rd party programs..

    (unless you're trying to be sarcastic towards me)

    the program is working as designed for those who don't want to see google's stuff.
  11. Thalagyrt Member

    Update on this - interestingly, with Check IPs unchecked, it DOES actually work and clean up the posts/ban the user, but the postback to the client never seems to happen and they get the timed out message. 1.0RC1 here.
  12. Spok New Member

    Sweet. Will you add the "can't post a link until x amount of posts"?
  13. Brandon Schwery New Member

    This is awesome! I am definitely going to buy XenForo now!
  14. Grumpy New Member

    Wow, what an awesome feature. This definitely reassures me that you didn't copy anything off of vBulletin, they couldn't come up with anything this clever and then implement it too! :p
  15. Saeed Well-Known Member

    I think you just nuked the always annoying spammers with this. Well done, Kier. Loved the video too. ;)
  16. erich37 Well-Known Member

    for certain spammers, I just see the "Registration IP" within the Spam-cleaner.
    I do not see the "Confirmation IP" and also not the "Content IP".

    Is there a specific reason for that?
  17. CurveGotti Active Member

    Have they confirmed their address, and posted?
    I've seen this too, but only with unconfirmed accounts.
  18. erich37 Well-Known Member

    yes, account was confirmed. No posts in the Forum. But spamming other member profiles.
  19. CurveGotti Active Member

    That is really strange I would think they would show up in that case. :-X
  20. erich37 Well-Known Member

    when using the spam-cleaner, do I need to make some other actions within ACP ?

    Like for example hide the spammers Profile-page to public-view ?
    And do I need to set the spammers profile-privacy to "people spammer follows" ?
    There is also the Privacy-setting named "Initiate conversations with this user:" : are other members able to contact a banned spammer via Private Conversation?

    Am just discovering several spam-accounts and wondering whether the Spam-cleaner is sufficient or whether I need to do other steps, like e.g. hiding the spammers Profile-page (so it is only visible to people who the spammer is "following".

    What is the best approach here? Should I make a profile-post into the spammers Profile-page, so that other members are aware that this user is a spammer ?

    Appreciate your help and advise!

Share This Page