M Matthew2D Well-known member Apr 3, 2012 #1 When I was reading a review of my forum, I noticed that the reviewer said that my statistics said 300 posts when I really have 378 posts. Why? Thanks.
When I was reading a review of my forum, I noticed that the reviewer said that my statistics said 300 posts when I really have 378 posts. Why? Thanks.
trilogy33 Well-known member Apr 3, 2012 #2 78 are deleted? Site stats don't include deleted posts. Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Bunce Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #4 Do you mean the Forum Statistics block on the index page? Where is the incorrect number? Upvote 0 Downvote
M Matthew2D Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #5 Yes, I mean that. The incorrect number is 306, it should be 384. Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Bunce Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #6 Try running these things: Admin CP -> Tools -> Rebuild Caches > Rebuild Thread Information > Rebuild Forum Information Admin CP -> Tools -> Cron Entries -> Rebuild Board Totals Counter -> Controls: Run Upvote 0 Downvote
Try running these things: Admin CP -> Tools -> Rebuild Caches > Rebuild Thread Information > Rebuild Forum Information Admin CP -> Tools -> Cron Entries -> Rebuild Board Totals Counter -> Controls: Run
M Matthew2D Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #7 Okay. I'll do it later. I have to go to school. Upvote 0 Downvote
Jake Bunce Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #9 Matthew2D said: Yes, I mean that. The incorrect number is 306, it should be 384. Click to expand... Where did you get 384 from? Upvote 0 Downvote
Matthew2D said: Yes, I mean that. The incorrect number is 306, it should be 384. Click to expand... Where did you get 384 from?
M Matthew2D Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #10 Well, the reviewer said It should be 378 when I had 300 posts. Now i have 306 posts so just add 78 to 306. Upvote 0 Downvote
Well, the reviewer said It should be 378 when I had 300 posts. Now i have 306 posts so just add 78 to 306.
Jake Bunce Well-known member Apr 4, 2012 #11 What reviewer? We have been proceeding on the premise that the number is wrong, but a rebuild of the counters changed nothing so I question the claim that the number is wrong. Upvote 0 Downvote
What reviewer? We have been proceeding on the premise that the number is wrong, but a rebuild of the counters changed nothing so I question the claim that the number is wrong.