/styles/Snog/Checkmark/
to ./styles/Snog/Checkmark/
, so the image is found, even when the forums reside in a subdir.snog_checkmark_conversation_notread
and$recipient.last_read_date
into the phrase snog_checkmark_conversation_read
.The proper fix for this would be...changed the image path from/styles/Snog/Checkmark/
to./styles/Snog/Checkmark/
, so the image is found, even when the forums reside in a subdir.
{{ base_url('/styles/Snog/Checkmark/check.png') }}
{{ base_url('styles/Snog/Checkmark/check.png', true) }}
{{ base_url('styles/Snog/Checkmark/check.png') }}
Correct. Just provided a quick one.The proper fix for this would be...
Change:
{{ base_url('/styles/Snog/Checkmark/check.png') }}
To:
{{ base_url('styles/Snog/Checkmark/check.png', true) }}
Support: XF 2.2
Changed: Addon name to [OzzModz] Conversation Read Checkmark
Added: Support link for addon in the addon list in the ACP.
Added: Missing files that contains the checkmark image.
Fixed: Problem with icon not showing if the site is not in the root.
To make your life easier, @ozzy47 , I have added a zip with a reworked template.xml and a new graphic to this post.
This contains:
What needs to be done is,
- showing unread, when conversation is unread
- uses fa-eye and fa-eye-slash for better recognition
- added a red minus png, when using images instead of fa
- changed the image path from
/styles/Snog/Checkmark/
to./styles/Snog/Checkmark/
, so the image is found, even when the forums reside in a subdir.
Regards,
- to create a new phrase
snog_checkmark_conversation_notread
and- to add the
$recipient.last_read_date
into the phrasesnog_checkmark_conversation_read
.
Chris.
One way to find out: just give it a try. Everything else is up to @Ozzy47 if he decides to include those changes into a next release.is this still compatible?
esp for those first 2 listed we would like to include for sure if possible, the xml seems a little dated tho wasnt sure to try it...
on another note, we noticed somewhere along the line, for us, the checkmark has turned into a thumbs up icon....somehow...i sort of wanted to change that but now im seeing this suggestion and im liking the idea of the eye/eye-slash even better.
perhaps one or 2 more options or idk....what do we think?
Ozzy, is this coming with Permissions settings as well?
In my case it would be useful to enable this feature to admins only, just to make sure that users which doesn't reply at all (I have quite a few) have seen the message we sent them or not, and eventually take action.
Just before someone says taking action based on that it's unfair, I have a fresh example.
The other day we didn't approve a reply by a new user as it was breaking a rule in our Terms & Conditions.
So I sent him a DM, telling that we couldn't approve his reply because of that. But I want to make sure he sees the related message before deleting it, so he will understand what was wrong with it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.