Opensource Adobe Suite

Anthony Parsons

Well-known member
Licensed customer
Someone vibe coded the entire Adobe suite... opensource and free to use, Windows, Linux and Mac. Impressive stuff.


Adobe shares will continue to plummet... people will lose their jobs. No copyright, designed from the ground up, it just replicates Adobe suite products, but it is named differently and coded uniquely. Lots of trouble for a lot of companies.

Screenshot 2026-10-08 192221.webp
 
Interesting. I like the idea in principle but have never really used these tools in a serious way so am probably not the best one to judge. We have an excellent and extremely Adobe conversant graphic designer at work who I call on and I use GIMP (in very amateur way) for the bit of image editing I do at home. Looks like it is still very early in the game, too. Probably won't be ready for prime time (i.e. corporate use) for a while. But it's exciting to see.
 
Wouldn't go that route myself considering you can get it from the actual site.
It costs a fair amount.
 
Someone vibe coded the entire Adobe suite... opensource and free to use, Windows, Linux and Mac. Impressive stuff.
The individual apps can be downloaded and used for free. There are pricing plans there. Maybe for their online suites?
 
Last edited:
Is this not a copyright infringement?
Most of what Adobe does wouldn't be copyrightable, just the specific way they implement it. So as long as they aren't copying Adobe's code and make things different enough in the look and feel, they could be okay on that front. That's my understanding anyhow. A lawyer would know better.
 
Most of what Adobe does wouldn't be copyrightable, just the specific way they implement it. So as long as they aren't copying Adobe's code and make things different enough in the look and feel, they could be okay on that front. That's my understanding anyhow. A lawyer would know better.
OK, good point. Hence how Affinity can do all the same stuff.
 
Most of what Adobe does wouldn't be copyrightable, just the specific way they implement it.

That's something which needs to be challenged in a court of law.

Adobe's General Terms of Use specifically states: '17. No Modifications, Reverse Engineering, Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)'

On GitHub, Thomas describes the ArtCraft apps as a “clean-room reimplementation” of Adobe’s apps, which is a fanciful, industry-standard way to describe a design that allegedly does not infringe on any copyright. It effectively reverse-engineers functionality and recreates it without relying on copyrighted assets or a protected codebase.

As things stand right now, so called 'clean room implementation' is legal (in the UK) meaning only the code and distinctive design is protected, not the function. In my view this has to be challenged in court or we are likely to see the annihilation of multiple software companies which in turn will lead to a loss of innovation.
 
Yeah, good luck convincing anyone to move their entire suite to a vibecoded unsupported mess that no one on earth fully understands the internals of.
 
Yeah, good luck convincing anyone to move their entire suite to a vibecoded unsupported mess that no one on earth fully understands the internals of.
A lot of photographers & other creatives have switched to either free or lower cost alternatives to Adobe and, being on GitHub, the "internals" are available for anybody to check out.

 
I know some photographers that have moved to different free softs, or one time purchase. I personally use Luminar and for video editing I use Final Cut Pro. No way I will be paying for the adobe subscription model.
 
Looks nice, I'm a person who would rather have a native desktop app vs an electron/TS powered frontend for a desktop app.

I'll probably stick with the combo of Affinity and DaVinci Resolve.
 
Back
Top Bottom