Arnox
Active member
I recently received a report that the site KiwiFarms had its XF license officially revoked. Now, I get it. KiwiFarms has always been incredibly disreputable, but the XF team now revoking licenses based on (at least what I'm hearing) hosted content sets a very dangerous precedent both for XF and for customers. It already says clearly in the License Agreement that XF is not responsible or liable for anything that customers use the software for. By revoking licenses due to hosted content, this could be taken as a statement that XF is now holding itself liable for ALL content that is hosted on ALL customers' sites.
This decision could also potentially harm customers as well because now, anyone can message XF saying for whatever reason that a site is offensive or unacceptable and will demand license revocation or they will threaten to sue the company. Will XF judge and oversee all these complaints? Will all people who register complaints against a site be grounds for license revocation?
I humbly ask that the XF team please rethink this decision, maybe not necessarily for KF, but for all forums in the future that could come into the crosshairs next. XF has always been the leading standard for forum and even general site software. It hurts greatly to see this beginning to happen. Thank you.
This decision could also potentially harm customers as well because now, anyone can message XF saying for whatever reason that a site is offensive or unacceptable and will demand license revocation or they will threaten to sue the company. Will XF judge and oversee all these complaints? Will all people who register complaints against a site be grounds for license revocation?
I humbly ask that the XF team please rethink this decision, maybe not necessarily for KF, but for all forums in the future that could come into the crosshairs next. XF has always been the leading standard for forum and even general site software. It hurts greatly to see this beginning to happen. Thank you.