XF 2.2 Is there any built-in feature or addon that prevent link masking?

Kacee

Active member
For example, one could post a link like this https://google.com and trick people into thinking that will lead to google, but in fact it leads to bing...

Is there any built-in feature or addon that check to see if the link text is an URL and use it as the real destination URL instead of the provided one?
 
while this is not what you are looking for but it does help me in a lot of scenarios.

 
trick people into thinking that will lead to google, but in fact it leads to bing
And that's different than "spoofed emails" how?
There is a method for the users to manually check when using desktop... simply hovering over the link.


Screen Shot 2023-07-01 at 11.09.10 PM.png

With the iPhone, simply press on the link and hold and you get a preview. Takes a few extra seconds... but if security is a concern then the user will already know about this and utilize it.

Since you can link any text to a URL, I doubt there's going to be an easy way to prevent it from happening. If you have users doing this, then moderation is the appropriate venue to handle it.
 
And that's different than "spoofed emails" how?
There is a method for the users to manually check when using desktop... simply hovering over the link.


View attachment 287934

With the iPhone, simply press on the link and hold and you get a preview. Takes a few extra seconds... but if security is a concern then the user will already know about this and utilize it.

Since you can link any text to a URL, I doubt there's going to be an easy way to prevent it from happening. If you have users doing this, then moderation is the appropriate venue to handle it.
So you have to do that and told your user to do that with every links on your forums? It is not a security concern, it is an inconvenience and I would like to find a way to help my users avoid it.

A simple way is to check to see the link text is an proper URL and use it instead of the provided URL, I can't see any legitimate reason for anyone to do that.

Thanks.
 
So you have to do that and told your user to do that with every links on your forums? It is not a security concern, it is an inconvenience and I would like to find a way to help my users avoid it.
As long as you can enter text, then link that text to a URL it is going to happen. The users simply need to have some responsibility for their own safety.
As for the issue I give you:
https://whitehouse.gov
It is a classic example.. it's text that I entered.. then used the link button to link to a URL. Anyone familiar with simple BBCode can do that even if you remove the Insert Link option from the editor menu.
All it takes is entering this directly into the editor
Code:
[URL='https://thepipestand.com']https://whitehouse.gov[/URL]

What you are wanting to do is confirm that the text that the user sees is the exact link that is utilized.... and as I've explained, by the very nature of the editor and use of BBCode, that cannot easily be done. Pretty sure this issue is present in ANY online editor that allows use of BBCode and/or html to be created.
You may be able to engage a 3rd party developer to code an add-on that replaces the Link URL BBCode and put in validation/match checking.
 
Last edited:
Honestly. He can just use this.


Should work for his purpose.
Think at one time for the 1.x line there was also an add-on that warned you when you were going to an outside source....
Pity that it's not a built in feature.
At around $40USD a year to keep it "updated"... rather expensive for what it offers. I pay slightly more than that for one of Bob's add-ons.
 
Last edited:
You may be able to engage a 3rd party developer to code an add-on that replaces the Link URL BBCode and put in validation/match checking.
that is EXACTLY what I am asking, and I'm pretty sure it can be done, easily I might add. In fact I will take a look, it's been 10 years or so since I did any serious coding but I'm having some free time at the moment.
 
And yet another paid "solution" to a simple thing that in todays era should actually be built in... but with the lack of concern from the @XenForo developers we see for such simple improvements... odds are they'll continue to push this type of stuff off to third parties at the continued further cost for their license holders. Seems such simple stuff as this is "to much of a hassle" for them.
And in case you can't tell.. yes, I'm somewhat exasperated with the XF "plan" for their continued existence... honestly, if it wasn't for the many third party developers... they'd be having severe issues with their continuing financing. For many things.. they are WAY to dependent on outside resources to provide basic (and expected) features.
 
Top Bottom