• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

hosting images

mistypants

Well-known member
#3
Definitely your server because then you can rely upon them. If Flickr or photobucket were to change their URLs, remove your image, or even delete your account, you'd be out of luck. Photobucket also compresses images, resulting in quality degradation oftentimes (or at least, they did when I last used the site in 2009). I don't believe flickr does because they're geared toward photographers.

If it were something like video, which could potentially eat a lot of bandwidth or storage, I could understand using an external solution, but for images, you can't beat storing them on your own server.
 

Shelley

Well-known member
#4
Your own server.

However, because guests can't see screenshots on my site I do post a secondary screenshot which is remotely hosted. But essentially your own server is always the better solution to house your images.