Oh wow, gone for a couple of hours and a lot of things to respond to

Will do the things I can answer fast, and then longer answers for the graphs, as they can easily be misinterpreted
It is a Beta release, and the AMP page for tags and "forum list" views might not look good if you have other addons running that add widgets etc on top of the page.. On my own forum it looks good, but I don't run any addons that do widgets for guests there.
Installed. ) Looks like it works fine so far. The only "thing" I could find was this unlinked "Filters" word in forumviews.
Plus I don't think I like top pagination buttons.
If we expect that mostly these pages are visited by first-time visitors that came from google search, why would we want to put on the top place a button "go from this page to another page"?
Does it look the same if you visit that page as a visitor? it might be some buttons still show if you are logged in

Try as logged out or through e.g. incognito/private mode
Not really what you expect ? Which date did you install AMPXF ?
Just a note:
this was his results after initial 7 days, the graph doesn't show this too well without extra lines drawn in
BTW I installed the version of AMPXF which supports Bob's AMS articles add-on on 1/26. I did a comparison of activity from 1/6 - 1/26 vs. 1/27 - 2/17. Overall PV for articles are down
-26.45%. For comparison, threads are down
-7.15%. Sitewide, pageviews are down
-13.91%.
Try limiting the "second part" to cut off already at 6/7th February, as there was apparently a Google algo update 7/8th..
...maybe AMPXF is stripping out some very valuable SEO features in Bob's add-on - anyone else having negative impact with AMS?
That's a good idea and I will double check it

, although the AMP addon doesn't really strip out any meta tags, but mostly content that is not allowed by AMP spec anyway
I will have to run out for some errands, but will return soon with responses to the various graphs
