Even the vB version of this was never a clone of Easy Forms and it will never be a clone of Easy Forms.
This will most likely never happen. For example, a full text editor answer question type could never be used as a title.
I don't see this happening either. This can be done with regex and would be redundant.
Already on the wish list.
When opening a form won't happen. It's already possible when submitting a form.
Already on the wish list.
This is already on the wish list.
This is already on the wish list.
Thanks for the response. I'm glad to see many of these are planned for implementation. Your earlier responses gave me the impression you were opposed to adding database functionality, and I don't think I saw most of the others mentioned.
I would ask you to reconsider including questions in the thread title. You already caution admins to be aware of what they're including in the First Question, as quoted below, so why are other questions different? The first question is not always the most relevant or identifiable, and in many cases, two or even three answers are needed to create a descriptive title for a thread.
{2} = First Question Answer NOTE: Use caution when using this option. A thread title is limited to 100 characters. Use that as a guide when considering using the First Question Answer in the title.
Redundant or not, I think simple character limits would be appreciated not just by myself but by most users of this add-on. I can string RegEx together when needed, but if I'm only doing character limits, just being able to plug in the numbers is more convenient. I need character limits on most questions, I only need more complex limitations on a few of them.
I must confess that I'm not seeing an option to execute custom PHP when users submit a form on my currently installed version, 1.0.0. Am I missing it, or do you mean that it's included in a coming update?
I never claimed or intended the implication that this was a clone of Easy Forms. I only wanted to provide an example of an existing mod that had the features I was asking for, showing that it is
possible to include them. I would prefer not to make unreasonable, pie-in-the-sky requests. If a free add-on made almost 8 years ago on a less advanced software can do it, though, I see little reason why a more advanced,
paid add-on on more advanced software could not. Believe me that if it was free, I wouldn't complain, and would just be grateful for what I received, but it's not. Maybe it's my fault for not asking these questions
before buying, but I paid for the add-on under the assumption that I could at least recreate forms I've used on my forums for years.
Thank you again for your response. I look forward to future updates and seeing how this add-on evolves.
And as long as we're here, Happy New Year!