Resource icon

Additional Notable Groups 1.0.3

No permission to download

Naz

XenForo developer
Staff member
NixFifty submitted a new resource:

Additional Notable Groups - Allows you to show additional user group tabs on the notable members page.

Rerelease of an older paid add-on from Extra License that has now been open-sourced and made available free of charge. Pretty simple in functionality and allows you to display additional user group tabs on the members page.

Installation:
  1. Extract the contents of the .zip file provided upon successful purchase.
  2. Upload the contents of the 'upload' folder to your root XenForo directory.
  3. Install the provided .xml file through the XenForo Admin Control Panel.
  4. Configure...

Read more about this resource...
 
Does not seem to be working at all.
Goes to a page like
forum/members/?type=41

However, loads the default user list based off most messages
 
Does not seem to be working at all.
Goes to a page like
forum/members/?type=41

However, loads the default user list based off most messages
Do you have other add-ons that interface with the member lists?
Yes. Of course xD
even still, would have been better if it was more seo friendly.
Noted. Literally, this was just a re-brand and re-release of the older paid add-on from Extra License. I'll probably get to it eventually but the code is available for anyone else to do. :)
Can the usergroups this enables be sorted by post count, by default?
They are sorted by message count by default.
 
I realize this is a dead addon but I installed it to see if it fit a need, which it does, partially. The additional groups are alphabetical, not ordered by post count, but that's OK. Might be nice to have an option for how to order them (or just hard code it, but be able to change)

What I wanted to find out was if there was a way to remove the limit on how many members were displayed in the list.

Also I was hoping to find a way to have a permission to allow someone to start a group PM with everyone in the list.

@NixFifty I don't suppose either of these would be simple?
 
Top Bottom