@RoyalRumble @Stuart Wright
I'm happy to update anything OTHER than the actual detection.
If I can make it support 2.3, I'm happy to do so. I'm also happy to make sure it continues to work with 2.2x for anyone that paid for it.
I don't want to abandon the project, the problem is I'm not happy/proud with the detection. I know ways it can be circumvented, and for large/popular websites, people are able to specifically bypass the detection if they're knowledgeable enough. As a result, for large website owners, they're going to be upset at me. For smaller/niche websites, this works great. However, since I can't prevent large website owners from purchasing and then getting upset at me, I'm a bit stuck.
On the good side, it works for most users and websites, but won't always work for all (depending on their userbase and the level of cunning of some). Additionally, there's RasberryPi hole, etc.
I'm not sure what to do.
I thought marking this resource [Unmaintained] seemed most honest on my end. I can change it back, but thought I'd get your input first.
What do you guys think?
I stopped using this addon a long time ago when detection and support stopped.
I didn't resume its use in case it got removed again. I don't want to piss off my members by removing, then reinstating addons and I need addon authors to be consistent and reliable.
People who release addons for free have zero obligation to their users to maintain and update it. Users would still get upset if authors withdrew any free addon.
People who charge a fee do have an obligation to their customers. That's why I was upset when the detection and support stopped.
Particularly because the addon was excellent, solved a specific problem and did it a professional way. That's why I paid for it.
It may still be excellent, but I haven't looked at it since it was removed.
If you recall, I suggested a multiplier for the number of page loads required to remove the flag dependent upon the number of times they have turned ad blocking on and off. This combats the people to repeatedly turn on ads to access something and then block them the rest of the time.
I felt like we helped you to make the addon better, I appreciated you doing that and that improvement was a big benefit to us.
I'm not worried by a tiny minority of people who use their own methods to bypass ad blocking.
I'm only really interested in finding the majority of people who are blocking ads with adblock+ or whatever are the most common apps.
However, if the tech wizards share the method to bypass this addon on my forum and it's an easy process to implement then the addon would be pretty useless.
To quantify it, if the addon detects, say, 95%+ of ad blocking members and bypassing it is quite a hassle, and I felt it would continue to be supported, then I'd be happy to use it again. However, our commercial team have been in talks for a while with companies to provide a more generic adblocker recovery system.
Once I can reliably add a new adblocker usergroup to members' accounts (and, of course, remove it quickly after they allow ads), then I can incentivise those people to allow ads for AVForums by denying them access to the additional features like competitions and classifieds (both of which are free to access, so I feel justified in requiring the viewing of ads to access them).
As
@bzcomputers writes, transparency is key and over promising and underdelivering is the best way to upset people.
Thanks for asking and I hope my answer helps.