I appreciate the people that recommended threadmarks. It doesn't seem to be what I'm looking for and seems rather clunky. Couldn't even get any help in trying to figure it out.
Can anyone recommend a custom add-on maker for this? I got kind of burned by a guy in the past. Can't remember his...
@Xon is there a forum I can look at that this is on? I looked at both your spacebattle and velocity forums and I'll be honest, their was just so much stuff I couldn't figure it out. My forum is a single node and what I saw on your forums was just overwhelming to me.
Thanks!
I didn't know exactly how to phrase this but my forum relies heavily on news/breaking events. People come looking for information and often times, the thread gets saturated with people arguing about things or whatever.
On a different software, you could view the thread w/ only posts by staff...
My forum has a long running historical info thread that someone else started. They'd like to change the title every day to reflect something new posted. If they were OP, they could.
Is there some way I could give this user power to do that short of making him a moderator? I looked through...
I'd love to see the ignore features expanded. I paid for one of the above add-ons and it works ok. It's implemented poorly in my opinion.
And then I paid a well known developer here to create a more thorough ignore feature and he created a decent concept but one that had a lot of bugs and then...
Had a user say they were getting issues when they tried to search for and use the GIF function.
I am an idiot so I don't know what this means. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
My users came from a forum software that is absolutely awful. But, it did do a few things that actually made a little sense to me. Like the attached where when you click on a thread you had previously been reading, there is an indicator after the last reply you'd seen and indidcating all the new...
Hmmm. Maybe you are right. I just thought I remembered it.
The ignored users I think aren't having their posts registered as read so the thread never appears to be completely read.
Anyway, thanks.