Recent content by 🔥Iggy🔥

hold on so everyone starts saying how sad it is 2.4 is not here and nothing clear on when that will be released.....then now they want XF to implement all this third party code that already exists? i feel like just focus what your trying to do already, the editor etc thats overdue....im fine...

yes surely instructing people on new ways to be harmful is going to help the situation :p i dont like thinking about offensive material and all the evils of the world that dont have to do with my life AT ALL. i feel like they are forcing everyone just to push these invasive anti human laws....i...

i guess the issue is they get to define what harmful is....and their intentions arent automatically purified because they said they are. its a slippery slope...theres also is not a global world government(yet). it seems like in history freedom of information and communication online has been...

its all being tested as they go but theres some concerning precedence with all this if its allowed, which seems like it will.....im considering a few things just now anyway.... youtube already has login requirements for age verification on some content....i imagine this eventually extending...

dont the same rules apply for you tube? im a little foggy how sites like discord seem to be ignoring this but that seems unreasonable for you to be responsible for whats posted on an external site.....i mean most the world is not going to block the uk and call it a day....so maybe it is early...

im saying it looks like a reach to me, like idk if they can even ask for that.....but im sure they will want to ask for something they didnt define yet etc...so we have to wonder what that might be..... a screenshot of a date stamped rule would do that, but without the date stamp idk......im...

i didnt quite notice the rule being date stamped....that would be nice just simple evidence to present....but yes im not overly concerned as on their list or anything....just things like IP logs or anything you know....it seems like they could force giving things like that up? just to prove you...

thats what we are doing, but it still sort of leaves a question like how are we supposed to "prove" that we have done that, or what exact steps should be taken etc...i mean this of course which seems like it should be enough, idk..

still waiting for redis support.....

and digitalpoint and julianD :p:cool:

2.3 was a bigger jump across a larger gap of time....also dealt with more code areas...i dont expect to see the same pattern.....it still is concerning tho because this was supposed to be the rushed upgrade before 3.0 and it starts to feel we will get it close to when i used to imagine early 3.0...

i think what could be really nice on this one is an option to "sticky" threadmarks.... sometimes there can be quite a lot of threadmarks in a thread and it would be very helpful to be able to button press navigation to "featured posts", from anywhere on the page while viewing. i am picturing a...

personally i dont like the idea, its more admin work for synonyms and such....im fine with lower cased acronyms etc f.y.i. my 2 cents.....or perhaps an option to allow it or disallow really then everyone can have their way.

try it with a relative url....works for me...idk content: url(images/imagename.jpg);