Recent content by DragonByte Tech

You still can’t have 1 entry per version regardless. Bear in mind I have an addon with over 100 updates (eCommerce). The amount of bloat in addon.json would be immense. I fully support the concept of having a changelog config section that tells XF where my changelog file is located and what...

I think this is a fragment of the vBulletin days, which is where this exact stylistic choice originated - all keywords lowercase except for AS. To be honest, it doesn’t bother me at all - I see dotted line I Opt-Enter and hit “Php-Cs-Fixer: Fix the entire file” 🤷‍♂️ I’ve spent a lot of time...

Also, while you're looking at DB exceptions, \XF\Db\Exception should be renamed to \XF\DbException so we can use them without needing to make an alias - it's too generic of a class name :D

This has now been fixed, thanks :D

DragonByte Tech updated [DBTech] DragonByte Bluesky Poster with a new update entry: 1.2.2 Read the rest of this update entry...

Oh, I misunderstood what you meant, I thought you were saying the tags in the posts themselves were showing %23geek. I bet they auto prepend the # now 🤔

I'll test it locally when I have time :) If I don't post back later today, feel free to post @ DBTech so it gets logged and I can review it later!

I am not able to replicate this @ my own site, see this post: Does this happen when you use the global tags, per-forum tags, or thread tags?

DragonByte Tech updated [DBTech] DragonByte Social Groups with a new update entry: 2.4.0 Read the rest of this update entry...

DragonByte Tech updated [DBTech] DragonByte Mail with a new update entry: 5.1.0 "Gold" Read the rest of this update entry...

RTFCL (Read The Fabulous Change Log) ;) It's not my fault if someone uses an older version of the addon. The issue has been fixed for over three months and there have been no reports of the issue persisting.

That issue has been resolved in v5.1.0b1: https://www.dragonbyte-tech.com/store/dragonbyte-mail.342/release/2215/ As there are no reported bugs in the v5.1 line, it can be considered stable at this time. v5.1.0 "Gold" will contain no changes other than a minor fix to the "Maintenance" AdminCP...

No. Bulk checks don't return results in the normal way, they send you an email when the results are ready, so you would be manually handling thousands of emails. Furthermore, it doesn't save any credits as it still counts 1 email = 1 lookup.

I don’t believe I apply any specific ordering so presumably in order by user ID ascending, but I don’t know.

Then your best bet is to export the log from your validation service, as any numerical statistic like that above does not constitute proof of anything.